Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to the Fire Emblem Arena Battle League.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join the FEABL, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, free enemas, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, free, and highly recommended.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in. Don't keep us waiting (or else)!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
I would like to register a formal complaint...
Topic Started: Jul 6 2006, 03:22 PM (61 Views)
Tookie
Member Avatar
Pretend I put something witty here.

As a citizen of this country, which I believe in and which I have seen Mr. Jeff Veasey tear apart, I must begin the debate about Jeff's attitudes. Unless you share my view that Jeff has gone way too far with his no-compromise attitude, there's no need for you to hear me further. At this point, all I can do is repeat a line from my previous letter: "He publicly disavows his ties to stoicism while secretly encouraging his acolytes to impose tremendous hardships on tens of thousands of decent, hard-working individuals". Even though he insists that the Earth is flat, I certainly contend that anyone with eyes and a brain can tell that you may be worried that he will trivialize the issue faster than you can say "pseudoparenchymatous". If so, then I share your misgivings. But let's not worry about that now. Instead, let's discuss my observation that Jeff tries to make us think the way he wants us to think, not by showing us evidence and reasoning with us, but by understanding how to push our emotional buttons.

I am now in a position to define what I mean when I say that anyone who thinks that Jeff's propositions won't be used for political retribution has never been hauled before a tribunal and accused of unilateralism. What I mean is that the point at which you discover that his dupes must be exposed and neutralized wherever they lurk is not only a moment of disenchantment. It is a moment of resolve, a determination that I trust him about as far as I can throw him. But the problems with his prognoses don't end there. Did Jeff cancel his plans to usher in the beginning of an amoral new era of pessimism because he had a change of heart, or is he continuing the same battle on another front? It would appear to be the latter. The following is a preliminary attempt to establish some criteria for discussion of these complex issues. To begin with, he used to complain about being persecuted. Now Jeff is our primary persecutor. This reversal of roles reminds me that the gloss that his subalterns put on his stances unfortunately does little to shape a world of dignity and harmony, a world of justice, solidarity, liberty, and prosperity. He is trying to destroy that which is the envy of -- and model for -- the entire civilized world. His mission? To let dirty, boisterous carousers serve as our overlords.

Many people are incredulous when I tell them that Jeff intends to treat people like worthless slobs. "How could Jeff be so slatternly?", they ask me. "It doesn't seem possible." Well, it is doubtlessly possible, and now I'll explain exactly how Jeff plans to do it. But first, you need to realize that there is little doubt that he doesn't perceive that anything is wrong with him. That's just a fancy way of saying that Jeff's homilies are based on a denial of reality, on the substitution of a deliberately falsified picture of the world in place of reality. And this dishonesty, this refusal to admit the truth, will have some very serious consequences for all of us in a lustrum or two. That's just one side of the coin. The other side is that poison is countered only by an antidote. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement and, in many cases, it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it indisputably expresses how Jeff's maudlin preoccupation with jingoism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as "hippopotomonstrosesquipidelian", would make sense if a person's honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to destroy our moral fiber. As that's not the case, we can conclude only that if Jeff had his way, schools would teach students that the rules don't apply to him. This is not education but indoctrination. It prevents students from learning about how when Jeff says that those of us who oppose him would rather run than fight, that's just a load of spucatum tauri.

I wouldn't waste my time trying to feed the starving, house the homeless, cure the sick, and still find wonder and awe in the sunrise and the moonlight if Jeff's threats weren't parroted by so many sententious sewer rats. But there's the rub; inasmuch as I disagree with Jeff's accusations and find his ad hominem attacks offensive, I am happy to meet Jeff's speech with more speech and, if necessary, continue this discussion until the truth shines. Think of Jeff's equivocations as being the sum of two components: a morally crippled-to-the-core component that consists of Jeff's desire to descend to character assassination and name calling and a sordid component that consists of everything else. We are concerned primarily with the former. I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why it is not my goal to bring this battle to a fever pitch, but the opposite. My peers aver that Jeff is as vitriolic as the sky is blue. While this is unequivocally true, I feel we must add that Jeff's claims are saturated with the indecent rhetoric that will decidedly insult the intelligence, interests, and life plans of whole groups of people. And that's why I'm writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to put an end to power-drunk resistentialism. There's no way I can do that alone, and there's no way I can do it without first stating that if he can one day turn a deaf ear to need and suffering, then the long descent into night is sure to follow. Jeff favors manipulative psychological techniques over honest discussion. Nevertheless, I can state with absolute certainty that I can guarantee the readers of this letter that there's something fishy about Jeff's whinges. I think he's up to something, something horny and perhaps even domineering.

It is becoming increasingly obvious to many people that I cannot, in good conscience, step aside and let the most unsavory slaves to fashion you'll ever see turn scalawags loose against us good citizens. Let me recap that for you, because it really is extraordinarily important: Jeff's paroxysms are not witty satire, as he would have you believe. They're simply the stroppy ramblings of someone who has no idea or appreciation of what he's mocking. Did you know that some nefarious, lascivious miscreants want to help Jeff manipulate everything and everybody? Others just want to ride the priggism bandwagon. In either case, Jeff managed to convince a bunch of brown-nosing Jeff Veasey clones to help him poke someone's eyes out. What was the quid pro quo there? Fortunately for us, the key to the answer is obvious: He has never seen a statistical correlation that he couldn't somehow turn into a causal claim fitting his besotted ideology. An equal but opposite observation is that if you want to hide something from him, you just have to put it in a book.

The concepts underlying Jeff's snivelling, crude hatchet jobs are like the Ptolemaic astronomy, which could not have been saved by positing more epicycles or eliminating some of the more glaring discrepancies. The fundamental idea -- that the heavens revolve around the Earth -- was wrong, just as Jeff's idea that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements is wrong. Documents written by Jeff's apple-polishers typically include the line, "Jeff has mystical powers of divination and prophecy", in large, 30-point type, as if the size of the font gives weight to the words. In reality, all that that fancy formatting really does is underscore the fact that Jeff's goal is to discredit legitimate voices in the colonialism debate. This is abject particularism! Are you prepared to discuss this, Jeff? Statements like, "I will not stand by and let anyone twist my words or change my position in order to serve some slef-deceiving political strategy" accurately express the feelings of most of us here. He is like a giant octopus sprawling its slimy length over city, state, and nation. Like the octopus of real life, Jeff operates under cover of slef-created screen. He seizes in his long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every agency created for the public protection.

When I first heard about Jeff's "compromises", I dismissed them as merely fickle. But when I later learned that he wants me to cower before the emotions and accusations of others, I realized that Jeff doesn't care about freedom, as he can neither eat it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to him. Now, I'm going to be honest here. Whenever a will-o'-the-wisp of cynicism, however unreal, turns up anywhere, he is off at a trot. I'll stand by that controversial statement and even assume that most readers who bring their own real-life experience will agree with it. At a bare minimum, if you're the type who dares to think for yourslef, then you've probably already determined that Jeff has been known to say that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is. That notion is so meddlesome, I hardly know where to begin refuting it.

Given a choice of having Jeff burn his opponents at the stake or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day. It would be bad enough if his apostles were merely trying to prosecute, sentence, and label people as testy, deluded casuists without the benefit of any evidence whatsoever. But their attempts to promote, foster, and institute obscurantism are just plain vexatious. Repeating something over and over does not make it true. Am I saying that he gained ascendancy through monstrous abuse of his sympathizers? Yes. That this is a fundamental and obvious truth that he totally ignores? Maybe. That I can fight only for something that I love, love only what I respect, and respect only what I at least know? Definitely.

Jeff may be reasonably cunning with words. However, he is thoroughly sappy with everything else. This makes me fearful that I might someday find myslef in the crosshairs of his mutinous perversions. (To be honest, though, it wouldn't be the first time.) If you want a better opportunity to get a job, raise a family in a safe neighborhood, have a better chance at a good education, and lower the taxes on the money you earn, then I ask that you help me shelter initially unpopular truths from suppression, enabling them to ultimately win out through competition in the marketplace of ideas. Jeff will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as "perfidious" or "unrestrained". That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise.

If there is one thing I have learned, it is this: I want to guide the world into an age of peace, justice, and solidarity. I want to do this not because I need to tack another line onto my résumé, but because Jeff's a pretty good liar most of the time. However, he tells so many lies, he's bound to trip himslef up someday. To say anything else would be a lie. Of perhaps even more concern is that I have frequently criticized Jeff's unspoken plan to direct social activity toward philanthropic flimflam rather than toward the elimination of the basic deficiencies in the organization of our economic and cultural life. He usually addresses my criticisms by accusing me of isolationism, sectarianism, child molestation, and halitosis. Jeff hopes that by delegitimizing me this way, no one will listen to me when I say that Jeff is frightened that we might scrap the entire constellation of backwards ideas that brought us to our present point. That's why he's trying so hard to prevent whistleblowers from reporting that he keeps telling us that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years. Are we also supposed to believe that he can change his choleric ways? I didn't think so. I wonder what would happen if Jeff really did corrupt our youth. There's a spooky thought. As a parting thought, remember that Mr. Jeff Veasey is crazier than a road lizard.

(Jeff Veasey = CJayC for those who don't know)
Flare
 
Okay.

You have been dressed down by Tookie for trolling.

This topic is now over. It can be mathematically proved that there is no adequate comeback to that simple fact.


Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
KJ456
Member Avatar
Ahahahaha- *snort* -hahahaha- *snort* -heheheh

Ew, WoT.

Rant generator, I take it?
Posted Image

Do not click. Do, however, click these at your leisure ('specially for stats): Gero, Terra, Tic, Nys'elni and Murphy.

Posted Image
Banner by Shade.

Challenges open if I'm around, though you'd better be prepared to stat, 'cause I'm lazy.

My theme, according to the Mooney one.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Fallen Morning Flare
Member Avatar
HiMAT Laharl!

...you know, Max tried the very same gen on us...

Don't want to stat? Web statuator, effort-free version. Still in testing.
OC:____|Firiel 12 Vestal|Ithryn 19 Knight|Ivrin 20/4 Sage|Hathall 15/1 Barbarian|
Retired: |Mark 20/20 SM|Elenwë 20/20 FK|Isfin 20/20 WL|

▂▅▇█▓▒░¬__¬░▒▓█▇▅▂
rpg.net
 
"That is neither alive nor dead which may be eternally superposed. And with strange observations even death may die."
~ Erwin Schrödinger, last known journal entry.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kinkajou
Member Avatar
I make iron women out of iron maidens

tl;dr
"Some say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I've tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice."

Robert Frost, "Fire and Ice"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tookie
Member Avatar
Pretend I put something witty here.

More fun against Ceejus though..
Flare
 
Okay.

You have been dressed down by Tookie for trolling.

This topic is now over. It can be mathematically proved that there is no adequate comeback to that simple fact.


Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · DEATH FLICKIE!!! · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Etavarium Theme created by Zeus00 and converted by Wolt of the ZetaBoards Theme Zone