Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Keyboard Friends. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
The Mystery of the MV Joyita; A KF Unex report.
Topic Started: Jul 15 2012, 07:25 AM (220 Views)
Les
Member Avatar
I use a computer, therefore I am.
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
In 1955, a boat named the MV Joyita set sail from for a two-day voyage to Tokelau Islands. She was carrying 25 people and a light cargo. The boat never arrived at its destination. No distress signals had been received ... she had just vanished.
A huge search mission was organized. But the vessel wasn't found until over a month later with no one on board.
The Joyita was flooded and partially submerged.

The boat's logbook and navigational equipment were all missing. So were the dinghy, all 3 lifeboats and the food. The radio was found to be in perfect working order and set to the emergency frequency. But, it only had a range of a couple of miles because of messed-up wiring that had gone unnoticed.
Pretty straightforward? The ship started leaking and they had to abandon it, because they were unable to signal for help?

Well, that would be a good theory, except for the fact that the boat was entirely seaworthy. There was a large hole in the superstructure, indicating that she'd collided with something, but the hull had not been breached, and there was only a small amount of water inside the boat which was mainly due to it bobbing in the waves like a cork for weeks.

If the crew and passengers were in lifeboats why weren't any of them spotted by air rescue? Lifeboats are designed for good visibility, and they don't sink easily. And we're not talking about one lifeboat here, but three - and a dingy.

To add to the mystery, nearly all of the windows of the ship were smashed and the main engine was covered in mattresses for some odd reason. Only one of the other engines was working. One of the passengers, a doctor, had, strangely, left his medical bag on the deck. Several instruments had been removed and in their place were bloody rags. The ship's clocks had stopped at 10:25 p.m. (Except the grandfather clocks in the Captain's cabin, which showed a different time).

So, what happened aboard the Joyita? (Which went on to enjoy a rather unhappy career where she distinguished herself by regularly running aground).

Why did the doctor leave his instruments behind?
Why were the mattresses piled on top of the engines?
What happened to the crew, passengers, three lifeboats and one dingy?
 
Duck
Member Avatar
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Pirates.

The boat's logbook and navigational equipment were all missing.

Great idea if you don't want to alert authorities for a while or make their identification harder *See mafia hits, removing hands and head for more*


She was carrying 25 people and a light cargo

Perfect target for pirates


No distress signals had been received

Why would they with a gun at their heads


So were the dinghy, all 3 lifeboats and the food.

Set adrift with no adequate means to propel themselves back to the ship. Chance of rescue or surviving is extremely low.




If the crew and passengers were in lifeboats why weren't any of them spotted by air rescue? Lifeboats are designed for good visibility, and they don't sink easily.


Because they were swallowed by the ocean, not sinking easily does not mean unsinkable.



So, what happened aboard the Joyita?

Pirates

Why did the doctor leave his instruments behind?

Pirates aren't known for their strong moral compass and high moral fibre


Why were the mattresses piled on top of the engines?

Pirates probably considered burning the boat


What happened to the crew, passengers, three lifeboats and one dingy?

The ocean got them
 
Les
Member Avatar
I use a computer, therefore I am.
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
I don't buy the mattresses. They didn't set fire to the boat.

Crew member: Captain! Pirates! What do we do?
Captain: Don't panic! Quick - come with me. I know what to do.
Crew member: Whew!
Captain: Get all the mattresses and bring them up on deck. Quick.
Crew member: Why?
Captain: Stop arguing. Get the mattresses ... now!
Crew member: Flippin' 'ek. Okay. I'm doing it.
A few minutes later
Crew member: Okay - I have them. Now what?
Captain: Put them on the engine.
Crew member: The pirates are on board - people are injured! Bleeding!
Captain: Just do it! It's vital that we do that.
Crew member: Okay, done it. Now what.
Captain: DUCK!!!!!
Crew member: Aaargh, scream, grunt, aaaaaaaaah! Choke. Gurgle. Splash!

:D
 
sherry
Member Avatar
sherry
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
I could go along with what you say Duck. But pirates normally let the world know they've kidnapped people and want a ransom, don't they?

If pirates had just wanted the money and belongings of the people wouldn't they have took that and left them on the boat, or killed them on the boat? Meaning lots of blood, not a small amount. Maybe they captured the people to use as their slaves? As if left to the ocean I'd have thought that out of 25 people that one would have been found washed up somewhere. They'd have had to submerge all of those boats and burst the dingy too for there to be no sign of them. Must have taken some time to do all that and take or kill the people too.

Then again I assume a lot can happen in a mass of ocean where parts remain unseen.
 
Duck
Member Avatar
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
A better question might be "are the Tokelau Islands known to be patrolled by pirates?"

Found a few theories

Quote:
 

The Joyita is sometimes referred to as the "Mary Celeste of the South Pacific" and has been the subject of several books and documentaries offering explanations that range from rational and conventional to supernatural and paranormal.[citation needed]

Numerous theories for the disappearance of the Joyita's crew and passengers have been advanced. Many were circulated at the time of the event, and several others have been put forward since.

Given the fact that the hull of the Joyita was sound and her design made her unsinkable, a main concern of investigators was determining why the passengers and crew did not stay on board if the events were simply triggered by the flooding in the engine room.



Captain injured theory

Captain Miller was well aware of the vessel's ability to stay afloat, leading some to speculate that Miller had died or become incapacitated for some reason (someone on board was injured- hence the bloodstained bandages). Without him to reassure the other people on board, they had panicked when the Joyita began to flood and had taken to the liferafts. However, this in itself would not account for the missing cargo and equipment, unless the vessel had been found abandoned and had her cargo removed.


A friend of Miller's, Captain S. B. Brown, was convinced that Miller would never have left the Joyita alive, given his knowledge of her construction. He was aware of tension between Miller and his American first mate, Chuck Simpson. Brown felt that Miller and Simpson's dislike of each other came to blows and both men fell overboard or were severely injured in a struggle. This left the vessel without an experienced seaman and would explain why those remaining on board would panic when the ship began to flood.



The "Japanese did it" and the piracy theories

The Fiji Times and Herald quoted at the time from an "impeccable source" to the effect that the Joyita had passed through a fleet of Japanese fishing boats during its trip and "had observed something the Japanese did not want them to see." Others theorize that modern sea pirates attacked the vessel, killed the 25 passengers and crew (and cast their bodies into the ocean), and stole the missing four tons of cargo.

The Daily Telegraph theorised that some still-active Japanese forces from World War II were to blame for the disappearances, operating from an isolated island base.

There was still strong anti-Japanese feeling in parts of the Pacific, and in Fiji there was specific resentment of Japan being allowed to operate fishing fleets in local waters. Such theories suddenly gained credence when men clearing the Joyita found knives stamped 'Made in Japan'. However, tests on the knives proved negative and it turned out the knives were old and broken- quite possibly left on board from when the Joyita was used for fishing in the late 1940s.



Insurance fraud theory

It was also revealed that Miller had amassed large debts after a series of unsuccessful fishing trips on Joyita. However, it would have been difficult to see the events surrounding the Joyita as insurance fraud, given that no seacocks were found open and the ship would be almost impossible to scuttle. Also, Miller was relying on Joyita being chartered for regular runs between Samoa and Tokelau- these government charters would have quickly cleared his debts.
Mutiny theory

One of Joyita's owners after the events of 1955, travel-writer Robin Maugham, spent many years investigating his vessel's past, and published his findings as The Joyita Mystery in 1962. Maugham agreed that events were started by the flooding from the broken cooling pipe and the failure of the pumps. The mattresses found covering the starboard engine were used either in an attempt to stem the leak or to protect the electrical switchboard from spray kicked up by the engine's flywheel as the water level rose. At the same time, the Joyita encountered increasingly heavy swells and squally weather.

Miller, knowing the Joyita to be unsinkable and desperate to reach his destination to clear his debt, pressed on. However, Simpson, and possibly other crew members, demanded that he turn back. This effectively led to mutiny and Miller and the crew struggled, during which Miller sustained a serious injury. By now the ship was entering heavier weather, with winds around 40 mph (64 km/h), and with one engine and a flooded bilge, was beginning to labour. The flooding in the engine room would have eventually caused the starboard engine to fail, also cutting all the vessel's electrical power. Simpson was now in control and made the decision to abandon ship, taking the navigational equipment, logbook and supplies, as well as the injured Miller, with them. It still seems unlikely that Simpson would choose to abandon a flooded but floating ship to take to small open rafts in the Pacific Ocean.

Maugham proposed that they sighted a nearby island or reef and tried to reach it, but in the strong winds and seas the rafts were carried out to sea, leaving the Joyita drifting and empty. The damage to the lightly built superstructure was caused by wave damage while the vessel was drifting in heavy seas.



 
Duck
Member Avatar
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
sherry
Jul 15 2012, 08:48 AM
I could go along with what you say Duck. But pirates normally let the world know they've kidnapped people and want a ransom, don't they?

If pirates had just wanted the money and belongings of the people wouldn't they have took that and left them on the boat, or killed them on the boat? Meaning lots of blood, not a small amount. Maybe they captured the people to use as their slaves? As if left to the ocean I'd have thought that out of 25 people that one would have been found washed up somewhere. They'd have had to submerge all of those boats and burst the dingy too for there to be no sign of them. Must have taken some time to do all that and take or kill the people too.

Then again I assume a lot can happen in a mass of ocean where parts remain unseen.

The biggest red flag that screams pirates is

Quote:
 

The missing four tons of cargo.
 
Les
Member Avatar
I use a computer, therefore I am.
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Duck
Jul 15 2012, 10:12 AM
sherry
Jul 15 2012, 08:48 AM
I could go along with what you say Duck. But pirates normally let the world know they've kidnapped people and want a ransom, don't they?

If pirates had just wanted the money and belongings of the people wouldn't they have took that and left them on the boat, or killed them on the boat? Meaning lots of blood, not a small amount. Maybe they captured the people to use as their slaves? As if left to the ocean I'd have thought that out of 25 people that one would have been found washed up somewhere. They'd have had to submerge all of those boats and burst the dingy too for there to be  no sign of them. Must have taken some time to do all that and take or kill the people too. 

Then again I assume a lot can happen in a mass of ocean where parts remain unseen.

The biggest red flag that screams pirates is

Quote:
 

The missing four tons of cargo.

Bits of wood and some empty oil drums? Not too valuable. And heavy!
 
Duck
Member Avatar
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Well to be accurate

Quote:
 

Her cargo consisted of medical supplies, timber, empty oil drums and various foodstuffs.


Still not too valuable but useful when you are working outside the law.
 
Les
Member Avatar
I use a computer, therefore I am.
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Nah. It was aliens.
 
lifesmate
Member Avatar
Administrator
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Laughing man les

mmmm 25 bodies,that is a lot for the pirates to hide.
Is weird not one has been found.
 
Duck
Member Avatar
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Not really, the sea managed to swallow up 11 hundred bodies when the Titanic went down.
 
lifesmate
Member Avatar
Administrator
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
really..that many? Shockhorror

 
Duck
Member Avatar
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Well there were 1500 victims, 700 rescued. The exact number that were trapped in the hull or dragged down in the ships wake is not known but the assertion is hundreds due to the number of Shoes found resting on the bottom...rather macabre.
 
Les
Member Avatar
I use a computer, therefore I am.
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Weren't some of the bodies washed ashore in Nova Scotia? I think any comparison needs a comparison of the sea depths and currents, but I'm not sure how you'd do that.

I do subscribe to the pirates theory, if I'm honest. I only hesitate because if it was that simple, it wouldn't be a mystery today. If you see what I mean.
 
Duck
Member Avatar
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
But is it really a mystery? I mean ask the US coastguard whether the Bermuda triangle is a mystery and you'll get a very different response from someone selling a book about it. The question is where the evidence leads you and whether you accept probable explanations as the cause. When you scratch beneath the surface of most so called mysteries and set aside the misleading language and ignored facts, you tend to be left with an unfortunate set of circumstances rather than the unexplainable, like our two Tv repairmen/UFO enthusiasts.
 
Les
Member Avatar
I use a computer, therefore I am.
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
That's true ... and I don't like it. :lol:
 
Duck
Member Avatar
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
:lol:
 
Les
Member Avatar
I use a computer, therefore I am.
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Except Roswell, of course.
 
Duck
Member Avatar
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
Oh I think I can apply the same logic to that one as well :D
 
Les
Member Avatar
I use a computer, therefore I am.
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Would that be weather balloons, or crash test dummies, Duck?
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Conspiracy Theories · Next Topic »
Add Reply