| Viewing Single Post From: Originality of miniature railway locomotives | |
|---|---|
| glastonrail | 19 Sep 2008, 06:07 PM |
|
Dommo
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well oddly on that point, Murray, Irt has spent more time AS River Irt than she ever did as Muriel. Therefore using some people's logic, it would actually be less historically accurate (yawn) to return her to original condition. So that brings us full circle while throwing a massive spanner in the works if you wish to try and define historical accuracy/originality, etc. I personally would not think twice about modifying an engine if it means it would be better suited to the job asked of it, but I would preserve the bits I take off if the modifications are major, if possible, or at least make a thorough record of the machine's condition prior to overhaul. Interesting points being raised. Cheers, Dom Greenop DMR |
|
"There's no such thing as sanity, and that's the sanest fact" M. Knopfler, 1985 Dragon Miniature Railway, Stockport http://www.freewebs.com/dragonrailway | |
![]() |
|
| Originality of miniature railway locomotives · Non Gauge Specific | |




![]](http://209.85.48.18/static/1/pip_r.png)


10:06 PM Nov 25