| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Welcome to Mock Parliament. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Social Justice Bill | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 9 2006, 03:51 PM (166 Views) | |
| Admin | Oct 9 2006, 03:51 PM Post #1 |
|
Admin
![]()
|
This bill hopes to eradicate the "classist" elements of Democratian society. Under this bill:
Hopefully this bill will help improve the nation.
|
![]() |
|
| Boohistory | Oct 9 2006, 03:57 PM Post #2 |
![]()
Minister for Awesome
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Lol nice try CC0 we can ALL see through that one :lol: |
![]() |
|
| Admin | Oct 9 2006, 03:58 PM Post #3 |
|
Admin
![]()
|
Why, whatever do you mean?
|
![]() |
|
| Boohistory | Oct 9 2006, 04:00 PM Post #4 |
![]()
Minister for Awesome
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Again I say, nice try |
![]() |
|
| Admin | Oct 9 2006, 04:04 PM Post #5 |
|
Admin
![]()
|
But surely caring for the poor and needy, equality and the principle that you should contribute to society, not inherit your wealth, are all key socialist values? |
![]() |
|
| Boohistory | Oct 9 2006, 04:07 PM Post #6 |
![]()
Minister for Awesome
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
'Tis surely the most obvious stealth bill i ever did see. I was suspicious when I read the first sentence, as you dont often propose bills and its so soon after the good of the majority act. Despite a few token socialist gestures, this bills main aim is to repeal the good of the majority bill's tax clauses. |
![]() |
|
| Admin | Oct 9 2006, 04:09 PM Post #7 |
|
Admin
![]()
|
Not repeal, improve! Surely by even acknowledging the existance of high earners in the Good of the Majority Bill, you are admitting defeat and betraying your values? Under this bill, all acknowledgement of them will cease and everyone will be equal!
|
![]() |
|
| Boohistory | Oct 9 2006, 04:12 PM Post #8 |
![]()
Minister for Awesome
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The high earners will still exist, whether they be land owners, lawyers or highly paid dustmen. The class system is based on status rather than money. Take my father, he is on a middle class wage but works in a quarry so he is working class despite what he earns becuase he is a manual labourer. |
![]() |
|
| Admin | Oct 9 2006, 04:14 PM Post #9 |
|
Admin
![]()
|
Ah, but you've abolished Land Owners.
|
![]() |
|
| Boohistory | Oct 9 2006, 04:15 PM Post #10 |
![]()
Minister for Awesome
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
lol there are still land owners. they just dont own very much
|
![]() |
|
| eriatarka1 | Oct 9 2006, 05:10 PM Post #11 |
![]()
Home Secretary
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Actually, I'm thinking that this might be useful, it appears to have struck the balance that the Good of the Majority Act just missed, not because its intentions were wrong, but more because of the compromises due to discussion. Also, it is actually a SHOCKINGLY left-wing bill, I'm surprised. |
![]() |
|
| Admin | Oct 9 2006, 05:31 PM Post #12 |
|
Admin
![]()
|
A 45% inheritance is much, much, much better than a 50% income tax.
|
![]() |
|
| HRH King Zog II | Oct 9 2006, 05:36 PM Post #13 |
|
Waffler of the House of Boreds
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The majority doesnt need helping, that was the key flaw in the Good of the Majority Act |
![]() |
|
| Pokemaniac John | Oct 9 2006, 06:05 PM Post #14 |
![]()
Mister Speaker
![]()
|
*will support if Boo ever stops making bill and it comes to a vote* |
![]() |
|
| eriatarka1 | Oct 10 2006, 09:09 PM Post #15 |
![]()
Home Secretary
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
*gotta agree* But the queue's still far too long...ah well. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Legislation · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2










![]](http://z1.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)



7:16 PM Jul 11