Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
> Opinion Polls
Party Ratings
Test: 50%
Current Government: National Party
National Issues
Health: 50% Education: 50% Economy: 50% Law & Order: 50%
Transport: 50% Social Affairs: 50% Environment: 50% Foreign Affairs: 50%
Government Reputation
Strength: 50%
Popularity: 50%
Trust: 50%

Welcome to Mock Parliament. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Boy Bush invades ANOTHER chaotic country
Topic Started: Jan 10 2007, 10:06 PM (176 Views)
Ozzymoto
Junior Member
[ *  * ]
Serisiously, doesn't this guy understand the concept of trial and error? Also the words "Let an old dog lie" come to my mind. Bush has invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, and achieved little sucess in restoring stability. Then why I ask you; does he decide to attack a poor, segregated, chaotic country that is in the misds of a civil war?

Because alledgedly the Bush administration has found "considerable believable intelligence" that Al-qae-ida have been receiving back up from the Islamic courts in Sudan. Those three words are the things that are said at the start of every Bush war. Sure he was right the first time, but isn't Afghanistan on the border of becoming a guerilla war?

Equally there are SEVENTY THOUSAND militants ready to take up arms against the U.S in Baghdad alone. There's only so much peace keeping you can do against a force of insurgeance like that. The "believable intelligence" of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq was wrong, and who's to say this intelligence is to be any different?

I think Bush has made a stupid blind gamble, and has possibly ruined Somalia's possibility of peace if they pursue this further.

What do you guys think of this? Did the US make a clever stratigical strike or will it be another one of his blind blunders into a fresh stream of hate from extermists?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Boohistory
Member Avatar
Minister for Awesome
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
urm have I missed something here

*checks bbc news*

America have not invaded anywhere as far as I can se :blink:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ozzymoto
Junior Member
[ *  * ]
Not so much invaded but launched air strikes from a camp north of Somalia.
They have troops posted and are alegadly going to go back and stay there untill they flush out al-qae-ida. Which is essentially an occupation since they're bound to try and stabalize the area and get the Somalian government in power...
and on that point I'll find a link XD
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ozzymoto
Junior Member
[ *  * ]
This is the first story in the events:
?
And these are all of the developments:
bbc news
They wheren't on the front page because it was all about how bad a job John Reed has done of the home office... again :lol:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · "Real" Politics · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Mock Parliament Wiki

Looking for the posts about Democratia, Ostentia or Brian Blessed? Click here.