| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Welcome to Mock Parliament. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Environment Questions | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jun 27 2007, 05:05 PM (91 Views) | |
| Admin | Jun 27 2007, 05:05 PM Post #1 |
|
Admin
![]()
|
This is the parliamentary question time for questions to the Department of the Environment. Members of the Commons may question the government on its environmental policy. Each member is limited to one question per week. This House recognises that there is no appointed minister for the environment, and so opens the floor to all government ministers. This House recognises Pokemaniac John as the Leader of the Opposition, and as such grants him the right to ask six questions per week. The government may only be asked to answer one question at a time - no new questions may be submitted until the previous one has been answered. If the government does not answer, action may be taken by the speaker of the commons. I therefore open this session with the following question: Will the government please outline to this house its environmental policy? |
![]() |
|
| Cieran | Jun 29 2007, 11:37 AM Post #2 |
![]()
Should-like-totally-be-the Prime Minister
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
We believe the environment is in an acceptable state as it is. As with our last term, we will only act if necessary. We do not wish to compromise environment for profit however... |
![]() |
|
| Admin | Jun 29 2007, 03:44 PM Post #3 |
|
Admin
![]()
|
Thank you Home Secretary, I now open this session to the house. |
![]() |
|
| DMHowe | Jun 29 2007, 03:49 PM Post #4 |
![]()
Under Investigation
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
What is your stance on nuclear power? |
![]() |
|
| Cieran | Jun 29 2007, 03:52 PM Post #5 |
![]()
Should-like-totally-be-the Prime Minister
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
As in the manifesto we believe that we should develop nuclear weapons ( ). We are not opposed to nuclear power though, I think, provided it is used responsibly and with the proper precautions and risk assessments...
|
![]() |
|
| Pokemaniac John | Jun 29 2007, 05:13 PM Post #6 |
![]()
Mister Speaker
![]()
|
What are the government's views on logging? |
![]() |
|
| Cieran | Jun 29 2007, 07:55 PM Post #7 |
![]()
Should-like-totally-be-the Prime Minister
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
We are opposed to clear cut logging on a large scale, and are in favour of sustainable, quick grow forests to meet wood demands... |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Questions · Next Topic » |








![]](http://z1.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)

). We are not opposed to nuclear power though, I think, provided it is used responsibly and with the proper precautions and risk assessments...


7:17 PM Jul 11