| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Welcome to Mock Parliament. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| PASSED: Vehicular Efficiency Motion | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 3 2008, 09:09 AM (285 Views) | |
| Cieran | Oct 3 2008, 09:09 AM Post #1 |
![]()
Should-like-totally-be-the Prime Minister
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I move that the Vehicular Efficiency Bill be passed into law... |
![]() |
|
| Sheepling | Oct 4 2008, 10:59 PM Post #2 |
|
SURVIVOR!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The question is as in the motion. As many who are of that opinion say aye, Aye! To the contrary no, No! Division! |
![]() |
|
| Lord Wallace Buttersworth | Oct 4 2008, 11:04 PM Post #3 |
|
Right Honourable Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nay |
![]() |
|
| Cieran | Oct 5 2008, 11:14 AM Post #4 |
![]()
Should-like-totally-be-the Prime Minister
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Aye!... |
![]() |
|
| HRH King Zog II | Oct 5 2008, 12:12 PM Post #5 |
|
Waffler of the House of Boreds
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You want a 4 ton bus to get 30 MPG? No. Not going to happen. Ever. Aye. Bill will probably require ammending to make it less garbled but aye nonetheless. |
![]() |
|
| plqx | Oct 5 2008, 02:14 PM Post #6 |
![]()
overlord of the Solafian universe
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nay. And if this bill is passed then I will instantly propose a NECESSARY ammendment. Well... necessary if you don't want mass starvation, and the collapse of the public transport network... |
![]() |
|
| eriatarka1 | Oct 5 2008, 03:22 PM Post #7 |
![]()
Home Secretary
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nay! If it's the environment, listen to plqx and PJ. They know their stuff. |
![]() |
|
| Pokemaniac John | Oct 5 2008, 03:52 PM Post #8 |
![]()
Mister Speaker
![]()
|
It's actually meant to be no, not nay. |
![]() |
|
| Cieran | Oct 5 2008, 06:58 PM Post #9 |
![]()
Should-like-totally-be-the Prime Minister
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Green party my arse -_-. You had ample time to raise these objections, the bill has been sitting there for a week now... EDIT: OBJECTION! The 30mpg applies to "regular personal vehicles"! Vehicles opperated by companies (ie, trucks etc, which arn't personal) and public transport would be exempt! I knew I wasn't short-sighted enough to notice that... |
![]() |
|
| Pokemaniac John | Oct 5 2008, 07:16 PM Post #10 |
![]()
Mister Speaker
![]()
|
!!! *Hadn't realised* |
![]() |
|
| master dingley | Oct 5 2008, 08:45 PM Post #11 |
|
Learned Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
the NODS motion was posted before this ![]() anyways, this bill confuses me ![]() there are too many arguments on both sides you see >_< I think for this one I will Abstain. |
![]() |
|
| sqeak | Oct 5 2008, 08:58 PM Post #12 |
|
Learned Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Aye |
![]() |
|
| plqx | Oct 5 2008, 10:25 PM Post #13 |
![]()
overlord of the Solafian universe
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I did not raise an objection because I had effectively no access to the internet for 2 weeks. And a personally owned large van/minibus would be included, as would a combine harvester... |
![]() |
|
| Cieran | Oct 6 2008, 08:22 AM Post #14 |
![]()
Should-like-totally-be-the Prime Minister
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Combine harvesters are not registered road vehicles. They are employed for commercial use... |
![]() |
|
| miniyoda008 | Oct 6 2008, 09:07 AM Post #15 |
|
Master of the Force
![]()
|
Aye! (with some more improvement to be made afterwards) |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Debates · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2






![]](http://z1.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)









8:59 AM Jul 11