| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Welcome to Mock Parliament. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Minimum Wage Bill | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 17 2009, 12:59 PM (468 Views) | |
| Commoncold0 | Aug 29 2009, 01:26 PM Post #16 |
|
Elder Statesman
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
*still unhappy* Why does the 18-21 group have a lower minimum wage anyway? |
![]() |
|
| Cieran | Aug 29 2009, 01:41 PM Post #17 |
![]()
Should-like-totally-be-the Prime Minister
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Based it on the UK model... |
![]() |
|
| Commoncold0 | Aug 29 2009, 02:26 PM Post #18 |
|
Elder Statesman
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That's an excuse, not an argument.
|
![]() |
|
| Cieran | Aug 29 2009, 03:21 PM Post #19 |
![]()
Should-like-totally-be-the Prime Minister
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It's not an excuse, it's my rationale for putting it in... |
![]() |
|
| Commoncold0 | Aug 29 2009, 03:54 PM Post #20 |
|
Elder Statesman
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Still not an argument though. *remains opposed* |
![]() |
|
| Cieran | Aug 29 2009, 04:10 PM Post #21 |
![]()
Should-like-totally-be-the Prime Minister
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
What's wrong with it? It's just a transitional/development fee for those who aren't quite in full adulthood yet, but require more than children. If I removed it and just had a two-tiered system would you be less opposed?... |
![]() |
|
| Commoncold0 | Aug 29 2009, 04:24 PM Post #22 |
|
Elder Statesman
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Make it two tiered: under 18 and 18+. There's no reason whatsoever to have a special rule for 18-21 year olds. |
![]() |
|
| Cieran | Aug 30 2009, 11:10 PM Post #23 |
![]()
Should-like-totally-be-the Prime Minister
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Ah! I just realised why there's the middle bracket. It's those who have part-time jobs. They're not exactly paper-rounds, but it's people our age who need more money than those who are younger. But not as much as those who have "proper" jobs. It's for part-timers really. Whatever, it seems to matter to you so much so I removed it... |
![]() |
|
| Commoncold0 | Sep 1 2009, 03:49 PM Post #24 |
|
Elder Statesman
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well you could put it back for just part-time jobs - my objection was that a lot of people our age need full time jobs. :rolleyes: |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Legislation · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2





![]](http://z1.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)





12:58 AM Jul 11