| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| All Star Converse High Tops .; All Star Converse High Tops .All Star Converse High Tops . | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 14 2016, 10:52 AM (4 Views) | |
| yanda | Jul 14 2016, 10:52 AM Post #1 |
![]()
|
Moving along¡ Gris Converse All Star Pas Cher ¡°¡the Achilles tendon and the arch of the foot store a large amount of energy upon footstrike and then that energy is subsequently used upon take off. A forefoot strike has shown that it potentially uses this mechanism much better. One reason is that upon initial contact the foot is in better position to store the energy from the ground strike. In heel running, a great deal of the initial strike energy is lost. On a similar note, it is possible that a forefoot strike utilizes the stretch reflex mechanism better due to the position of the foot upon contact. With a forefoot strike the whole calf complex is in better position to be stretched and subsequently respond than in a heel strike.¡± ¡°Sorry Zero Drop.. you are misleading your bloggers.. you state ¡°Most conventional running shoes have an average drop of 12 mm, which places too much impact and stress on the heel region¡±. Nonsense.. show me the proof.. published in a peer reviewed scientific journal.¡± ¡°Significant differences have been noted both in joint kinematics, kinetics and ground reaction forces in forefoot striker Chaussures Converse 2015 Pas Cher s (McClay and Manal, 1995, Cavanagh et al, 1980, Oakley et al, 1988, Harrison et al, 1988). These differences include greater rearfoot plantarflexion and inversion and knee flexion at footstrike and greater peak dorsiflexion and eversion velocities. In addition, larger peak vertical and anteroposterior GRF have been noted along with larger peak powers at the rearfoot and lower peak powers at the knee in the FFS group. Vertical loading rates are also lower in FFS. RFS that have injuries thought to be associated with the force transient present with heel contact may do well to adopt a forefoot strike pattern resulting in the elimination of the impact peak and reduction of the loading rate. However, it is not known whether simply instructing someone to ¡°run on their toes¡± results in a biomechanical profile characteristic of a practiced or natural FFS.¡± overstrider-16OK, first, the bit about 10 degrees of dorsiflexion. I¡¯m no podiatrist, but I¡¯ve watched slow motion video of a lot of runners (thousands), and almost every one wearing a typical shoe with a ~12mm heel lift and extensive cushion is a heel striker (this data is working its way through peer review as I write this). You can look at the photo in Bill¡¯s post or the photo to the right and see that the sole of the shoe is virtually perpendicular to the lower leg just prior to contacting the ground. Assuming that shoe has a 12mm heel lift, it¡¯s quite possible that the foot inside the shoe is actually plantarflexed at heel strike. Furthermore, the runner in the photo above could plantarflex the foot a heck of a lot more and still be landing on the heel ¨C that¡¯s what overstriding will allow you to do. So, I¡¯ Converse Basse Pas Cher m not quite sure where that 10 degree figure comes from. Perhaps I¡¯m just misunderstanding what Bartold is saying, but then I¡¯m just a lowly blogger. Surely the folks at ASICS must be aware of the paper by Ryan et al., 2010. They showed that neutral runners did better in stability shoes, overpronators did better in neutral shoes, and all severe overpronators in motion control shoes got hurt. In other words, either the shoes don¡¯t do what they are supposed to, or static measures of the foot are not a good basi converse2016fr.com s for assigning shoes. And the study was supported by Nike. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · News · Next Topic » |







12:58 PM Jul 11