Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

WE WANT A FAIR GO FOR OUR AREA, MORE OPPORTUNITIES AND MORE THAN 4 NRL GAMES AT CAMPBELLTOWN STADIUM

Want to talk all things Wests? Click here for our Facebook Page
Locked Topic
Wests JRL Senior Season 2011; A Grade
Topic Started: Nov 4 2010, 07:56 PM (48,248 Views)
Warriors78
Member Avatar
NSW Cup
[ *  *  * ]
I see east & city & bulls are now on g6 website guess it's all over red rover the clubs have won
wests jl first loss since we went to appin
forfeits already in the 18s interesting what tomoro brings
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Warriors78
Member Avatar
NSW Cup
[ *  *  * ]
7yearitch
Apr 2 2011, 03:30 PM
IDENTIFIED
Apr 1 2011, 02:27 PM
Couch Potatoe
Mar 31 2011, 11:25 PM
cobras forever
Mar 31 2011, 07:38 PM
7yearitch
Mar 31 2011, 06:45 PM
Fence sitter
Mar 31 2011, 06:30 PM
parra eels
Mar 31 2011, 03:06 PM
Cj2011
Mar 31 2011, 02:58 PM
parra eels
Mar 31 2011, 02:40 PM
Cj2011
Mar 31 2011, 02:10 PM
parra eels
Mar 31 2011, 01:48 PM
Fence sitter
Mar 31 2011, 01:31 PM
disco stu
Mar 31 2011, 11:41 AM
Fence sitter
Mar 31 2011, 10:00 AM
Did you get an education at the Valley high school as well,
No need for this rubbish FS, :nono: <br /><br />We're not here to judge peoples education or spelling :finger:
Only joking Disco, Yobbo Robbo seems down to earth enough that he can take a joke
Sitter your information is wrong confirmed
LOL. Who would have thought????
would of thought what????
Who would have thought that fence sitters info was false???? I think it's classic that he's on the CRL forum asking blokes to " stop dribbling "..... And funnily enough that's all he does on here. Hypocrisy much?
LOL :rofl: He lives in Dream world :cstars: constant Wests bagger :finger:
Isn't that what a forum is about, to find out information, so your telling me the WT can come in and smash the competition and take the trophy at the end of the year, doesn't seem fair, but maybe it's a ploy, Tigers are sponsoring the comp is that correct, if they win they take there own winnings, it just gets better! :laughing:
hi all glad to be back and will try to tone down my humour, i am curious tho and hope this doesnt get taken the wrong way but easts and city were kicked out of campbelltown because of play and train rule that doesnt exist but womens side can leave to play in crl when there is nswrl comp available but still train in area and last year west magpies were not allowed to field a side as a directive from geoff carr in the domestic comp but west tigers can and if so where are they training, im assuming in the boundarys and also where is their 4 junior teams that is required to field a team in wests competition as titans was forced to do, i wish comp well but i think all has been very 1 sided, us 2 clubs left for better things, not to leave clubs aside but to leave management aside and if truth be known we did do a favour as we too strong but what west juniors are doing to our club and the 300 players we represent is nothing short of astonishing.
omg i would understand if you could prove u were kicked out but i defiently know that is not the case no one kicked you out off the wests comp yous left on your own and let the wests comp down so why not now just go your seperate ways stop all this bagging wests get on with your comp and let us worry about ours and dont think yous are above all you dont have every star that ever played footy every club has good players not just group 6 :clap: :clap: :clap: :magpies:
these 2 clubs were kicked out of the campbelltown area because they wanted to play in the group 6 comp,
they have had a non existent train & play rule, enforced on them, yet womens side got to choose where they play
these 2 clubs have now left the area & are now in the process of settling themselves into there new homes
then they will also relocate there juniors. :winner: :drink:
They have to relocate juniors in order to stay in group 6 that is part of there conditions they have to do this within two years good on ya cobra they wee never kicked out at all tehy left of there own accord and as for the womens comp the closest tot hem is group six so they can train were they like
we arent forced to do anything, juniors very seperate out there, same as it should be here, and womens comp same, if they in nswrl comp it fine but they chose to go crl so they should train in there boundary
oakdale aint ever had jnrs & there bin going for years in g6 seniors
so clearly they dont need jnr clubs like west do
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
DevelopmentCoach
Harold Matthews
[ *  * ]
OK there seems to be a few misconceptions about the "play and train" and 4 sides situations:

1. 4 teams is a restriction Wests Juniors put on any new club, regardless of seniors or juniors. To be an affiliated club you needed to have 4 junior teams. This goes back years, and was a factor in Liverpool City folding when they dropped under 4 teams. It is also coupled with a rule imposing restrictions on transfers for the first year of any new club. The rule is in place to ensure that there is actually a need/market for a new junior club, and that it can sustain without significantly detracting from the other clubs player numbers.

2. "Play and Train" has little to do with CRL vs. NSWRL. The idea behind the "rule" (which as it seems is not a rule) was that if a club had a viable local competition to play in, thats where they would have to play/train. If there was not, then the team would be open up to play in any viable competition to them. In the case of the minto girls, there is no Wests womens comp - so they are free to do as they wish. Compare this with the Easts/City situation where there is a local competition in place. It's comparing apples and oranges.

But honestly who cares, round 1 kicks off today, so lets just all enjoy some footy.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Fence sitter
NSW Cup
[ *  *  * ]
DevelopmentCoach
Apr 3 2011, 08:10 AM
OK there seems to be a few misconceptions about the "play and train" and 4 sides situations:

1. 4 teams is a restriction Wests Juniors put on any new club, regardless of seniors or juniors. To be an affiliated club you needed to have 4 junior teams. This goes back years, and was a factor in Liverpool City folding when they dropped under 4 teams. It is also coupled with a rule imposing restrictions on transfers for the first year of any new club. The rule is in place to ensure that there is actually a need/market for a new junior club, and that it can sustain without significantly detracting from the other clubs player numbers.

2. "Play and Train" has little to do with CRL vs. NSWRL. The idea behind the "rule" (which as it seems is not a rule) was that if a club had a viable local competition to play in, thats where they would have to play/train. If there was not, then the team would be open up to play in any viable competition to them. In the case of the minto girls, there is no Wests womens comp - so they are free to do as they wish. Compare this with the Easts/City situation where there is a local competition in place. It's comparing apples and oranges.

But honestly who cares, round 1 kicks off today, so lets just all enjoy some footy.
Reading what you have written, I can't see why the Eagles and Roos cannot train and play in the area, you write a viable competition, there is clearly no viable competition here! Roos and Eagles would smash everyone, Eagles winning the G6 pre season showed how strong they are! How many games in West will be forfeited today, I had a drink at Mac Tav last night and a Few Inglebye players where there saying there not playing, and where is Jeb, I also here Minto is in crisis, I know one handy player went to the bulls and others will follow, there is no viable comp! We all can see that, no matter how much smoke and mirrors are used!
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
mickrobbo
Member Avatar
NYC U20's
[ *  * ]
Fence sitter
Apr 3 2011, 08:24 AM
DevelopmentCoach
Apr 3 2011, 08:10 AM
OK there seems to be a few misconceptions about the "play and train" and 4 sides situations:

1. 4 teams is a restriction Wests Juniors put on any new club, regardless of seniors or juniors. To be an affiliated club you needed to have 4 junior teams. This goes back years, and was a factor in Liverpool City folding when they dropped under 4 teams. It is also coupled with a rule imposing restrictions on transfers for the first year of any new club. The rule is in place to ensure that there is actually a need/market for a new junior club, and that it can sustain without significantly detracting from the other clubs player numbers.

2. "Play and Train" has little to do with CRL vs. NSWRL. The idea behind the "rule" (which as it seems is not a rule) was that if a club had a viable local competition to play in, thats where they would have to play/train. If there was not, then the team would be open up to play in any viable competition to them. In the case of the minto girls, there is no Wests womens comp - so they are free to do as they wish. Compare this with the Easts/City situation where there is a local competition in place. It's comparing apples and oranges.

But honestly who cares, round 1 kicks off today, so lets just all enjoy some footy.
Reading what you have written, I can't see why the Eagles and Roos cannot train and play in the area, you write a viable competition, there is clearly no viable competition here! Roos and Eagles would smash everyone, Eagles winning the G6 pre season showed how strong they are! How many games in West will be forfeited today, I had a drink at Mac Tav last night and a Few Inglebye players where there saying there not playing, and where is Jeb, I also here Minto is in crisis, I know one handy player went to the bulls and others will follow, there is no viable comp! We all can see that, no matter how much smoke and mirrors are used!
:rofl: just worked out the inglebye is all about :rofl: some of your best fence sitter :rofl:
i hear info on minno is true me mate at bulls says they half little sherny will turn out with the bulls as early as next week and some others will follow him

ah inglebye i love it :rofl: burner you blokes fronting today :worship: :worship: against the tigers mob
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
mickrobbo
Member Avatar
NYC U20's
[ *  * ]
DevelopmentCoach
Apr 3 2011, 08:10 AM
OK there seems to be a few misconceptions about the "play and train" and 4 sides situations:

1. 4 teams is a restriction Wests Juniors put on any new club, regardless of seniors or juniors. To be an affiliated club you needed to have 4 junior teams. This goes back years, and was a factor in Liverpool City folding when they dropped under 4 teams. It is also coupled with a rule imposing restrictions on transfers for the first year of any new club. The rule is in place to ensure that there is actually a need/market for a new junior club, and that it can sustain without significantly detracting from the other clubs player numbers.

2. "Play and Train" has little to do with CRL vs. NSWRL. The idea behind the "rule" (which as it seems is not a rule) was that if a club had a viable local competition to play in, thats where they would have to play/train. If there was not, then the team would be open up to play in any viable competition to them. In the case of the minto girls, there is no Wests womens comp - so they are free to do as they wish. Compare this with the Easts/City situation where there is a local competition in place. It's comparing apples and oranges.

But honestly who cares, round 1 kicks off today, so lets just all enjoy some footy.
if it aint a rule then it cant be enforced :finger: train/play ah love it :rofl: :rofl:
inglebye :worship: and WT made up comp yeah real viable
minno and titans are the only viable teams in the comp poor bludgers need some competition they should follow the shielas lead and go out the area and play in a viable comp and be true winners :winner: :winner:
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Mad Tiger
Member Avatar
NYC U20's
[ *  * ]
mickrobbo
Apr 3 2011, 08:53 AM
DevelopmentCoach
Apr 3 2011, 08:10 AM
OK there seems to be a few misconceptions about the "play and train" and 4 sides situations:

1. 4 teams is a restriction Wests Juniors put on any new club, regardless of seniors or juniors. To be an affiliated club you needed to have 4 junior teams. This goes back years, and was a factor in Liverpool City folding when they dropped under 4 teams. It is also coupled with a rule imposing restrictions on transfers for the first year of any new club. The rule is in place to ensure that there is actually a need/market for a new junior club, and that it can sustain without significantly detracting from the other clubs player numbers.

2. "Play and Train" has little to do with CRL vs. NSWRL. The idea behind the "rule" (which as it seems is not a rule) was that if a club had a viable local competition to play in, thats where they would have to play/train. If there was not, then the team would be open up to play in any viable competition to them. In the case of the minto girls, there is no Wests womens comp - so they are free to do as they wish. Compare this with the Easts/City situation where there is a local competition in place. It's comparing apples and oranges.

But honestly who cares, round 1 kicks off today, so lets just all enjoy some footy.
if it aint a rule then it cant be enforced :finger: train/play ah love it :rofl: :rofl:
inglebye :worship: and WT made up comp yeah real viable
minno and titans are the only viable teams in the comp poor bludgers need some competition they should follow the shielas lead and go out the area and play in a viable comp and be true winners :winner: :winner:
Minto and Titans?? are you that pissed you are forgetting ESA??
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
7yearitch
Member Avatar
NYC U20's
[ *  * ]
mickrobbo
Apr 3 2011, 08:53 AM
DevelopmentCoach
Apr 3 2011, 08:10 AM
OK there seems to be a few misconceptions about the "play and train" and 4 sides situations:

1. 4 teams is a restriction Wests Juniors put on any new club, regardless of seniors or juniors. To be an affiliated club you needed to have 4 junior teams. This goes back years, and was a factor in Liverpool City folding when they dropped under 4 teams. It is also coupled with a rule imposing restrictions on transfers for the first year of any new club. The rule is in place to ensure that there is actually a need/market for a new junior club, and that it can sustain without significantly detracting from the other clubs player numbers.

2. "Play and Train" has little to do with CRL vs. NSWRL. The idea behind the "rule" (which as it seems is not a rule) was that if a club had a viable local competition to play in, thats where they would have to play/train. If there was not, then the team would be open up to play in any viable competition to them. In the case of the minto girls, there is no Wests womens comp - so they are free to do as they wish. Compare this with the Easts/City situation where there is a local competition in place. It's comparing apples and oranges.

But honestly who cares, round 1 kicks off today, so lets just all enjoy some footy.
if it aint a rule then it cant be enforced :finger: train/play ah love it :rofl: :rofl:
inglebye :worship: and WT made up comp yeah real viable
minno and titans are the only viable teams in the comp poor bludgers need some competition they should follow the shielas lead and go out the area and play in a viable comp and be true winners :winner: :winner:
if it isnt a rule, why is it imposed on us, why all clearances only put through on fri, why list so many as defaulters when that has to be listed at end ofg lastyear, why all of a sudden allow rep teams to play in comp,and what days do they train so we can go watch and are they there for 2 nights a week as required by geoff carr to call them local, it does all look like smoke and mirrors to prop up 1 and try screw another, 3 team comp aint right, let the ctown teams back to train and play and get more interest in local footy, im sure we can coincide side by side, we wont affect jl activities and they wont affect our goals so i say bring it on.....
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
mickrobbo
Member Avatar
NYC U20's
[ *  * ]
Mad Tiger
Apr 3 2011, 09:17 AM
mickrobbo
Apr 3 2011, 08:53 AM
DevelopmentCoach
Apr 3 2011, 08:10 AM
OK there seems to be a few misconceptions about the "play and train" and 4 sides situations:

1. 4 teams is a restriction Wests Juniors put on any new club, regardless of seniors or juniors. To be an affiliated club you needed to have 4 junior teams. This goes back years, and was a factor in Liverpool City folding when they dropped under 4 teams. It is also coupled with a rule imposing restrictions on transfers for the first year of any new club. The rule is in place to ensure that there is actually a need/market for a new junior club, and that it can sustain without significantly detracting from the other clubs player numbers.

2. "Play and Train" has little to do with CRL vs. NSWRL. The idea behind the "rule" (which as it seems is not a rule) was that if a club had a viable local competition to play in, thats where they would have to play/train. If there was not, then the team would be open up to play in any viable competition to them. In the case of the minto girls, there is no Wests womens comp - so they are free to do as they wish. Compare this with the Easts/City situation where there is a local competition in place. It's comparing apples and oranges.

But honestly who cares, round 1 kicks off today, so lets just all enjoy some footy.
if it aint a rule then it cant be enforced :finger: train/play ah love it :rofl: :rofl:
inglebye :worship: and WT made up comp yeah real viable
minno and titans are the only viable teams in the comp poor bludgers need some competition they should follow the shielas lead and go out the area and play in a viable comp and be true winners :winner: :winner:
Minto and Titans?? are you that pissed you are forgetting ESA??
esa who :rofl: sorry bruz all i see is minno titans putting up vialbe teams once i see esa results ill jump on the wagon :winner:
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Mad Tiger
Member Avatar
NYC U20's
[ *  * ]
hahaha ESA beat Titans comfortably in both Pre-season and in the 9's...
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
FootyMum
Bundy Cup
[ *  * ]
Fence sitter
Apr 3 2011, 08:24 AM
DevelopmentCoach
Apr 3 2011, 08:10 AM
OK there seems to be a few misconceptions about the "play and train" and 4 sides situations:

1. 4 teams is a restriction Wests Juniors put on any new club, regardless of seniors or juniors. To be an affiliated club you needed to have 4 junior teams. This goes back years, and was a factor in Liverpool City folding when they dropped under 4 teams. It is also coupled with a rule imposing restrictions on transfers for the first year of any new club. The rule is in place to ensure that there is actually a need/market for a new junior club, and that it can sustain without significantly detracting from the other clubs player numbers.

2. "Play and Train" has little to do with CRL vs. NSWRL. The idea behind the "rule" (which as it seems is not a rule) was that if a club had a viable local competition to play in, thats where they would have to play/train. If there was not, then the team would be open up to play in any viable competition to them. In the case of the minto girls, there is no Wests womens comp - so they are free to do as they wish. Compare this with the Easts/City situation where there is a local competition in place. It's comparing apples and oranges.

But honestly who cares, round 1 kicks off today, so lets just all enjoy some footy.
Reading what you have written, I can't see why the Eagles and Roos cannot train and play in the area, you write a viable competition, there is clearly no viable competition here! Roos and Eagles would smash everyone, Eagles winning the G6 pre season showed how strong they are! How many games in West will be forfeited today, I had a drink at Mac Tav last night and a Few Inglebye players where there saying there not playing, and where is Jeb, I also here Minto is in crisis, I know one handy player went to the bulls and others will follow, there is no viable comp! We all can see that, no matter how much smoke and mirrors are used!
There was a viable comp here for the 18's to play in before easts and roos took their teams to G6.
Maybe they were worried they couldn't smash everyone in the west 18's comp.
By removing these juniors and that is what they are still juniors, they have depleted this season of a decent competition and some players will miss out on a lot of footy because of it.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
mickrobbo
Member Avatar
NYC U20's
[ *  * ]
7yearitch
Apr 3 2011, 09:36 AM
mickrobbo
Apr 3 2011, 08:53 AM
DevelopmentCoach
Apr 3 2011, 08:10 AM
OK there seems to be a few misconceptions about the "play and train" and 4 sides situations:

1. 4 teams is a restriction Wests Juniors put on any new club, regardless of seniors or juniors. To be an affiliated club you needed to have 4 junior teams. This goes back years, and was a factor in Liverpool City folding when they dropped under 4 teams. It is also coupled with a rule imposing restrictions on transfers for the first year of any new club. The rule is in place to ensure that there is actually a need/market for a new junior club, and that it can sustain without significantly detracting from the other clubs player numbers.

2. "Play and Train" has little to do with CRL vs. NSWRL. The idea behind the "rule" (which as it seems is not a rule) was that if a club had a viable local competition to play in, thats where they would have to play/train. If there was not, then the team would be open up to play in any viable competition to them. In the case of the minto girls, there is no Wests womens comp - so they are free to do as they wish. Compare this with the Easts/City situation where there is a local competition in place. It's comparing apples and oranges.

But honestly who cares, round 1 kicks off today, so lets just all enjoy some footy.
if it aint a rule then it cant be enforced :finger: train/play ah love it :rofl: :rofl:
inglebye :worship: and WT made up comp yeah real viable
minno and titans are the only viable teams in the comp poor bludgers need some competition they should follow the shielas lead and go out the area and play in a viable comp and be true winners :winner: :winner:
if it isnt a rule, why is it imposed on us, why all clearances only put through on fri, why list so many as defaulters when that has to be listed at end ofg lastyear, why all of a sudden allow rep teams to play in comp,and what days do they train so we can go watch and are they there for 2 nights a week as required by geoff carr to call them local, it does all look like smoke and mirrors to prop up 1 and try screw another, 3 team comp aint right, let the ctown teams back to train and play and get more interest in local footy, im sure we can coincide side by side, we wont affect jl activities and they wont affect our goals so i say bring it on.....
best comment ive read on this forum so far
jl needs to bite the bullet let your strong viabrant comp live on and let the othrs get on as well so everyone is happy
the grubby tactics have not worked listing defaulters and putting clearances through after hours on a friday smells of grubbyness its not in the spirit of footy if wests jl had a viable comp they would not be stooping to these lows they are a sinking ship and its going down rapidly
i feel for the viable clubs in the comp they have been let down for years
i stay stop the rot and let everyone achive what they want to and everyone will be talking footy again end of story im a yobbo and i even know that :correct:
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
mickrobbo
Member Avatar
NYC U20's
[ *  * ]
Mad Tiger
Apr 3 2011, 10:04 AM
hahaha ESA beat Titans comfortably in both Pre-season and in the 9's...
comps aint won in pre season go titans :winner:
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Maverick
Member Avatar
NRL
[ *  *  *  * ]
All Saints 34 ESA 28 good comeback for All Saints after being behind 22-10 at half time
Edited by Maverick, Apr 3 2011, 07:19 PM.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Fence sitter
NSW Cup
[ *  *  * ]
7yearitch
Apr 3 2011, 09:36 AM
mickrobbo
Apr 3 2011, 08:53 AM
DevelopmentCoach
Apr 3 2011, 08:10 AM
OK there seems to be a few misconceptions about the "play and train" and 4 sides situations:

1. 4 teams is a restriction Wests Juniors put on any new club, regardless of seniors or juniors. To be an affiliated club you needed to have 4 junior teams. This goes back years, and was a factor in Liverpool City folding when they dropped under 4 teams. It is also coupled with a rule imposing restrictions on transfers for the first year of any new club. The rule is in place to ensure that there is actually a need/market for a new junior club, and that it can sustain without significantly detracting from the other clubs player numbers.

2. "Play and Train" has little to do with CRL vs. NSWRL. The idea behind the "rule" (which as it seems is not a rule) was that if a club had a viable local competition to play in, thats where they would have to play/train. If there was not, then the team would be open up to play in any viable competition to them. In the case of the minto girls, there is no Wests womens comp - so they are free to do as they wish. Compare this with the Easts/City situation where there is a local competition in place. It's comparing apples and oranges.

But honestly who cares, round 1 kicks off today, so lets just all enjoy some footy.
if it aint a rule then it cant be enforced :finger: train/play ah love it :rofl: :rofl:
inglebye :worship: and WT made up comp yeah real viable
minno and titans are the only viable teams in the comp poor bludgers need some competition they should follow the shielas lead and go out the area and play in a viable comp and be true winners :winner: :winner:
if it isnt a rule, why is it imposed on us, why all clearances only put through on fri, why list so many as defaulters when that has to be listed at end ofg lastyear, why all of a sudden allow rep teams to play in comp,and what days do they train so we can go watch and are they there for 2 nights a week as required by geoff carr to call them local, it does all look like smoke and mirrors to prop up 1 and try screw another, 3 team comp aint right, let the ctown teams back to train and play and get more interest in local footy, im sure we can coincide side by side, we wont affect jl activities and they wont affect our goals so i say bring it on.....
That won't happen, too many egos is ruining the game at Campbelltown!
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Maverick
Member Avatar
NRL
[ *  *  *  * ]
Who won Minto V Titans and Ingleburn V WT ?
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
AllSaints
Member Avatar
Dancer
[ *  * ]
Heard Titans beat Minto & WT Warriors beat Ingleburn
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
IDENTIFIED
Park Footy
[ * ]
Fence sitter
Apr 3 2011, 08:24 AM
DevelopmentCoach
Apr 3 2011, 08:10 AM
OK there seems to be a few misconceptions about the "play and train" and 4 sides situations:

1. 4 teams is a restriction Wests Juniors put on any new club, regardless of seniors or juniors. To be an affiliated club you needed to have 4 junior teams. This goes back years, and was a factor in Liverpool City folding when they dropped under 4 teams. It is also coupled with a rule imposing restrictions on transfers for the first year of any new club. The rule is in place to ensure that there is actually a need/market for a new junior club, and that it can sustain without significantly detracting from the other clubs player numbers.

2. "Play and Train" has little to do with CRL vs. NSWRL. The idea behind the "rule" (which as it seems is not a rule) was that if a club had a viable local competition to play in, thats where they would have to play/train. If there was not, then the team would be open up to play in any viable competition to them. In the case of the minto girls, there is no Wests womens comp - so they are free to do as they wish. Compare this with the Easts/City situation where there is a local competition in place. It's comparing apples and oranges.

But honestly who cares, round 1 kicks off today, so lets just all enjoy some footy.
Reading what you have written, I can't see why the Eagles and Roos cannot train and play in the area, you write a viable competition, there is clearly no viable competition here! Roos and Eagles would smash everyone, Eagles winning the G6 pre season showed how strong they are! How many games in West will be forfeited today, I had a drink at Mac Tav last night and a Few Inglebye players where there saying there not playing, and where is Jeb, I also here Minto is in crisis, I know one handy player went to the bulls and others will follow, there is no viable comp! We all can see that, no matter how much smoke and mirrors are used!
Roos and Eagles would smash every one i doubt that very much but you are entitled to your opinion there is a viable comp for them they just dont wish to play in it
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
IDENTIFIED
Park Footy
[ * ]
Fence sitter
Apr 3 2011, 05:59 PM
7yearitch
Apr 3 2011, 09:36 AM
mickrobbo
Apr 3 2011, 08:53 AM
DevelopmentCoach
Apr 3 2011, 08:10 AM
OK there seems to be a few misconceptions about the "play and train" and 4 sides situations:

1. 4 teams is a restriction Wests Juniors put on any new club, regardless of seniors or juniors. To be an affiliated club you needed to have 4 junior teams. This goes back years, and was a factor in Liverpool City folding when they dropped under 4 teams. It is also coupled with a rule imposing restrictions on transfers for the first year of any new club. The rule is in place to ensure that there is actually a need/market for a new junior club, and that it can sustain without significantly detracting from the other clubs player numbers.

2. "Play and Train" has little to do with CRL vs. NSWRL. The idea behind the "rule" (which as it seems is not a rule) was that if a club had a viable local competition to play in, thats where they would have to play/train. If there was not, then the team would be open up to play in any viable competition to them. In the case of the minto girls, there is no Wests womens comp - so they are free to do as they wish. Compare this with the Easts/City situation where there is a local competition in place. It's comparing apples and oranges.

But honestly who cares, round 1 kicks off today, so lets just all enjoy some footy.
if it aint a rule then it cant be enforced :finger: train/play ah love it :rofl: :rofl:
inglebye :worship: and WT made up comp yeah real viable
minno and titans are the only viable teams in the comp poor bludgers need some competition they should follow the shielas lead and go out the area and play in a viable comp and be true winners :winner: :winner:
if it isnt a rule, why is it imposed on us, why all clearances only put through on fri, why list so many as defaulters when that has to be listed at end ofg lastyear, why all of a sudden allow rep teams to play in comp,and what days do they train so we can go watch and are they there for 2 nights a week as required by geoff carr to call them local, it does all look like smoke and mirrors to prop up 1 and try screw another, 3 team comp aint right, let the ctown teams back to train and play and get more interest in local footy, im sure we can coincide side by side, we wont affect jl activities and they wont affect our goals so i say bring it on.....
That won't happen, too many egos is ruining the game at Campbelltown!
I am a rate payer and i will be damned if my money is going to a council to maintain a field used by people outside the district comp and if eagles and roos return in any form to there fields for sneaky training i for one will be straight out there with a petition to stop them rate payers will nto be helping you out
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Warriors78
Member Avatar
NSW Cup
[ *  *  * ]
any results from the strong vibant west comp?
18s & reggys?
a part time g6 secertary has posted already
Edited by Warriors78, Apr 3 2011, 09:32 PM.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · W.S.D.J.R.L · Next Topic »
Locked Topic


www.wests.co.nr is an unofficial forum run by volunteer Rugby League Supporters
Posts, messages, views, expressions or opinions on this forum DO NOT represent the official view of ANY Football Club.

Free Domains Hosting at .co.nr