Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

WE WANT A FAIR GO FOR OUR AREA, MORE OPPORTUNITIES AND MORE THAN 4 NRL GAMES AT CAMPBELLTOWN STADIUM

Want to talk all things Wests? Click here for our Facebook Page
Locked Topic
Season 2013
Topic Started: Oct 12 2012, 07:38 PM (235,938 Views)
Orana87
Member Avatar
NSW Cup
[ *  *  * ]
JGT
Jun 27 2013, 04:37 PM
All senior grounds are CLOSED besides Narellan.........
And apparently Narellan have an inspection tomorrow afternoon re Sunday's games vs City, so no green light there as yet.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Glitznglam
SG Ball
[ *  * ]
Maverick
Jun 21 2013, 08:21 AM
Footy59
Jun 20 2013, 07:05 PM
I think they are referring to the Baker / Gallant incident
Your are correct, I spoke to Jarryd last night and he has to face the Judiciary next week.

We were told he would go this week which is why I "assumed" the outcome above was for him, but I did have ??? in my comment.
Mav what was the outcome from your player fronting the jurdicary last night heard some whispers that the group haven't given him a suspension as yet and asked for more time,is 6 weeks not enough for them to come up with some sort of decision.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Maverick
Member Avatar
NRL
[ *  *  *  * ]
Glitznglam
Jun 28 2013, 07:48 AM
Maverick
Jun 21 2013, 08:21 AM
Footy59
Jun 20 2013, 07:05 PM
I think they are referring to the Baker / Gallant incident
Your are correct, I spoke to Jarryd last night and he has to face the Judiciary next week.

We were told he would go this week which is why I "assumed" the outcome above was for him, but I did have ??? in my comment.
Mav what was the outcome from your player fronting the jurdicary last night heard some whispers that the group haven't given him a suspension as yet and asked for more time,is 6 weeks not enough for them to come up with some sort of decision.
Unfortunately Jarryd could not attend the judiciary last night as he is in hostpital with bad Tonsillitous, so we have not heard anything more. Our advise is, that if his paperwork is in place (which it is) he can still be transferred to us after the June 30 deadline. It will be next week, at least before he can be heard again.
But with this round "likely" ??? to be cancelled as well, only 6 rounds of football remain.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Orana87
Member Avatar
NSW Cup
[ *  *  * ]
All G6 games washed out this weekend. Initial reports that rescheduling will be for weekend of July 13th- 14th.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Maverick
Member Avatar
NRL
[ *  *  *  * ]
Guest
(time=)
Maverick
Jun 28 2013, 08:56 AM
Glitznglam
Jun 28 2013, 07:48 AM
Maverick
Jun 21 2013, 08:21 AM
Footy59
Jun 20 2013, 07:05 PM
I think they are referring to the Baker / Gallant incident
Your are correct, I spoke to Jarryd last night and he has to face the Judiciary next week.

We were told he would go this week which is why I "assumed" the outcome above was for him, but I did have ??? in my comment.
Mav what was the outcome from your player fronting the jurdicary last night heard some whispers that the group haven't given him a suspension as yet and asked for more time,is 6 weeks not enough for them to come up with some sort of decision.
Unfortunately Jarryd could not attend the judiciary last night as he is in hostpital with bad Tonsillitous, so we have not heard anything more. Our advise is, that if his paperwork is in place (which it is) he can still be transferred to us after the June 30 deadline. It will be next week, at least before he can be heard again.
But with this round "likely" ??? to be cancelled as well, only 6 rounds of football remain.
Hey Mav post got deleted because I was asking the obvious why was Jarod suspended for a year and the oakdale player not brought in to answer questions, is the group making their own rules and why wasn't the time he spent off the field counted
I have not made any comments as I was trying to give him every chance of having a good result.
It seems though as if G6 are an "Anarchy" where the rules that apply to others don't have to apply to them.
This was a witch hunt, this kid dragged himself out of a hostpital bed on the promise that if he fronted he would be given a fair go and they didn't want to see him not playing football.

Then they didn't give him a decision until the next day and, which turned out to be a 12 month suspension on top of time already spent on the side line.

Anybody that thinks this is fair, is truly part of the G6 "Anarchy"

Even the charge sheet was worded in such a way that other persons involved could not be charged.

I hope those involved are very proud of themselves for what they have done :angry:

P.S I will send a copy of my comments to Galahs in case anybody decides to delete it.

Offline Profile Goto Top
 
tc6_11
Member Avatar
NRL
[ *  *  *  * ]
Maverick
Jun 29 2013, 09:54 AM
Guest
(time=)
Maverick
Jun 28 2013, 08:56 AM
Glitznglam
Jun 28 2013, 07:48 AM
Maverick
Jun 21 2013, 08:21 AM
Footy59
Jun 20 2013, 07:05 PM
I think they are referring to the Baker / Gallant incident
Your are correct, I spoke to Jarryd last night and he has to face the Judiciary next week.

We were told he would go this week which is why I "assumed" the outcome above was for him, but I did have ??? in my comment.
Mav what was the outcome from your player fronting the jurdicary last night heard some whispers that the group haven't given him a suspension as yet and asked for more time,is 6 weeks not enough for them to come up with some sort of decision.
Unfortunately Jarryd could not attend the judiciary last night as he is in hostpital with bad Tonsillitous, so we have not heard anything more. Our advise is, that if his paperwork is in place (which it is) he can still be transferred to us after the June 30 deadline. It will be next week, at least before he can be heard again.
But with this round "likely" ??? to be cancelled as well, only 6 rounds of football remain.
Hey Mav post got deleted because I was asking the obvious why was Jarod suspended for a year and the oakdale player not brought in to answer questions, is the group making their own rules and why wasn't the time he spent off the field counted
I have not made any comments as I was trying to give him every chance of having a good result.
It seems though as if G6 are an "Anarchy" where the rules that apply to others don't have to apply to them.
This was a witch hunt, this kid dragged himself out of a hostpital bed on the promise that if he fronted he would be given a fair go and they didn't want to see him not playing football.

Then they didn't give him a decision until the next day and, which turned out to be a 12 month suspension on top of time already spent on the side line.

Anybody that thinks this is fair, is truly part of the G6 "Anarchy"

Even the charge sheet was worded in such a way that other persons involved could not be charged.

I hope those involved are very proud of themselves for what they have done :angry:

P.S I will send a copy of my comments to Galahs in case anybody decides to delete it.

Peter Lett got suspended for the same amount of time as Jarrod. He did enter the field of play (albeit only 2 meters), he wasn't within 5 metres of any player and he never touched anyone. Did we jump up and down crying about it? NO
Now Jarryd and another Eagles player attack the Oakdale guy while he is getting in his car, and just because he worked him in the process of defending himself from being king hit you want him suspended? i'm sorry Mav but you have been totally blinded by this and poorly informed. You have obviously made up your mind on what happened, without having first hand knowledge.
You know what's disgusting, these 2 attacked him within a couple of metres of a few 3 year old children, and several wives. You want to bang on about it, well I think you should know the truth first.
There are no extenuating circumstances when you attack someone unprovoked Maverick, I feel sorry for him that he can't play football, but he forfeited his right when he made that decision.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
disco stu
Member Avatar
Country Origin
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
There's an ole saying maverick," believe in half of what you hear and all of what you see."
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
footylover
Member Avatar
NYC U20's
[ *  * ]
tc6_11
Jun 29 2013, 11:12 AM
Maverick
Jun 29 2013, 09:54 AM
Guest
(time=)
Maverick
Jun 28 2013, 08:56 AM
Glitznglam
Jun 28 2013, 07:48 AM
Maverick
Jun 21 2013, 08:21 AM
Footy59
Jun 20 2013, 07:05 PM
I think they are referring to the Baker / Gallant incident
Your are correct, I spoke to Jarryd last night and he has to face the Judiciary next week.

We were told he would go this week which is why I "assumed" the outcome above was for him, but I did have ??? in my comment.
Mav what was the outcome from your player fronting the jurdicary last night heard some whispers that the group haven't given him a suspension as yet and asked for more time,is 6 weeks not enough for them to come up with some sort of decision.
Unfortunately Jarryd could not attend the judiciary last night as he is in hostpital with bad Tonsillitous, so we have not heard anything more. Our advise is, that if his paperwork is in place (which it is) he can still be transferred to us after the June 30 deadline. It will be next week, at least before he can be heard again.
But with this round "likely" ??? to be cancelled as well, only 6 rounds of football remain.
Hey Mav post got deleted because I was asking the obvious why was Jarod suspended for a year and the oakdale player not brought in to answer questions, is the group making their own rules and why wasn't the time he spent off the field counted
I have not made any comments as I was trying to give him every chance of having a good result.
It seems though as if G6 are an "Anarchy" where the rules that apply to others don't have to apply to them.
This was a witch hunt, this kid dragged himself out of a hostpital bed on the promise that if he fronted he would be given a fair go and they didn't want to see him not playing football.

Then they didn't give him a decision until the next day and, which turned out to be a 12 month suspension on top of time already spent on the side line.

Anybody that thinks this is fair, is truly part of the G6 "Anarchy"

Even the charge sheet was worded in such a way that other persons involved could not be charged.

I hope those involved are very proud of themselves for what they have done :angry:

P.S I will send a copy of my comments to Galahs in case anybody decides to delete it.

Peter Lett got suspended for the same amount of time as Jarrod. He did enter the field of play (albeit only 2 meters), he wasn't within 5 metres of any player and he never touched anyone. Did we jump up and down crying about it? NO
Now Jarryd and another Eagles player attack the Oakdale guy while he is getting in his car, and just because he worked him in the process of defending himself from being king hit you want him suspended? i'm sorry Mav but you have been totally blinded by this and poorly informed. You have obviously made up your mind on what happened, without having first hand knowledge.
You know what's disgusting, these 2 attacked him within a couple of metres of a few 3 year old children, and several wives. You want to bang on about it, well I think you should know the truth first.
There are no extenuating circumstances when you attack someone unprovoked Maverick, I feel sorry for him that he can't play football, but he forfeited his right when he made that decision.
And if that's true I suppose so was the statement sayin nick Tomas who wasn't even at the ground that day was involved in the fight too ...
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
footydad
Harold Matthews
[ *  * ]
disco stu
Jun 29 2013, 11:25 AM
There's an ole saying maverick," believe in half of what you hear and all of what you see."
TC is always going to defend his new pin up boy! Group 6 management are always going to be anti Eagles! ill add this in if On the field of play a player KING HITS another that player retaliates dont both get sent and suspended depending on clean record and carry over points? Then some one please explain why nothing at all happened to the other party. Fair is Fair No matter what hat you have on this stinks.I agree with you Maverick.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Black&White
Member Avatar
NRL
[ *  *  *  * ]
footydad
Jun 29 2013, 12:53 PM
disco stu
Jun 29 2013, 11:25 AM
There's an ole saying maverick," believe in half of what you hear and all of what you see."
TC is always going to defend his new pin up boy! Group 6 management are always going to be anti Eagles! ill add this in if On the field of play a player KING HITS another that player retaliates dont both get sent and suspended depending on clean record and carry over points? Then some one please explain why nothing at all happened to the other party. Fair is Fair No matter what hat you have on this stinks.I agree with you Maverick.
The player has the right to appeal his sentence so he does have that avenue to go down if there are legitimate concerns over the decision of the judiciary.
Edited by Black&White, Jun 29 2013, 01:02 PM.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Blue Devil
NRL
[ *  *  *  * ]
tc6_11
Jun 29 2013, 11:12 AM
Maverick
Jun 29 2013, 09:54 AM
Guest
(time=)
Maverick
Jun 28 2013, 08:56 AM
Glitznglam
Jun 28 2013, 07:48 AM
Maverick
Jun 21 2013, 08:21 AM
Footy59
Jun 20 2013, 07:05 PM
I think they are referring to the Baker / Gallant incident
Your are correct, I spoke to Jarryd last night and he has to face the Judiciary next week.

We were told he would go this week which is why I "assumed" the outcome above was for him, but I did have ??? in my comment.
Mav what was the outcome from your player fronting the jurdicary last night heard some whispers that the group haven't given him a suspension as yet and asked for more time,is 6 weeks not enough for them to come up with some sort of decision.
Unfortunately Jarryd could not attend the judiciary last night as he is in hostpital with bad Tonsillitous, so we have not heard anything more. Our advise is, that if his paperwork is in place (which it is) he can still be transferred to us after the June 30 deadline. It will be next week, at least before he can be heard again.
But with this round "likely" ??? to be cancelled as well, only 6 rounds of football remain.
Hey Mav post got deleted because I was asking the obvious why was Jarod suspended for a year and the oakdale player not brought in to answer questions, is the group making their own rules and why wasn't the time he spent off the field counted
I have not made any comments as I was trying to give him every chance of having a good result.
It seems though as if G6 are an "Anarchy" where the rules that apply to others don't have to apply to them.
This was a witch hunt, this kid dragged himself out of a hostpital bed on the promise that if he fronted he would be given a fair go and they didn't want to see him not playing football.

Then they didn't give him a decision until the next day and, which turned out to be a 12 month suspension on top of time already spent on the side line.

Anybody that thinks this is fair, is truly part of the G6 "Anarchy"

Even the charge sheet was worded in such a way that other persons involved could not be charged.

I hope those involved are very proud of themselves for what they have done :angry:

P.S I will send a copy of my comments to Galahs in case anybody decides to delete it.

Peter Lett got suspended for the same amount of time as Jarrod. He did enter the field of play (albeit only 2 meters), he wasn't within 5 metres of any player and he never touched anyone. Did we jump up and down crying about it? NO
Now Jarryd and another Eagles player attack the Oakdale guy while he is getting in his car, and just because he worked him in the process of defending himself from being king hit you want him suspended? i'm sorry Mav but you have been totally blinded by this and poorly informed. You have obviously made up your mind on what happened, without having first hand knowledge.
You know what's disgusting, these 2 attacked him within a couple of metres of a few 3 year old children, and several wives. You want to bang on about it, well I think you should know the truth first.
There are no extenuating circumstances when you attack someone unprovoked Maverick, I feel sorry for him that he can't play football, but he forfeited his right when he made that decision.
Your kidding yourself Tom, the fact is, both players got into a scrap, so both players should have attended a hearing, if Brad Hopkins was found not guilty at the hearing fair enough, but again sounds like typical BS when one story is heard without the other, so Brad Hopkins doesn't even front, I wasn't there but was told by a number of people NOT associated with Eagles that Brad Hopkins got out of the car and king hit Jarryd and a number of people on the forum bragging that Brad had got out of the car and given it to Jarryd.

I agree Jarryd should find him self some time on the sidelines and he would admit that, but what he is given again just shows what your Group management is all about, these guys had been punished enough when Group 6 Management CHANGED the rules on our club saying we don't have juniors and clubs like yourself couldn't stand against the management about what is and was right, Your getting your favors so you should be happy
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Maverick
Member Avatar
NRL
[ *  *  *  * ]
Black&White
Jun 29 2013, 01:00 PM
footydad
Jun 29 2013, 12:53 PM
disco stu
Jun 29 2013, 11:25 AM
There's an ole saying maverick," believe in half of what you hear and all of what you see."
TC is always going to defend his new pin up boy! Group 6 management are always going to be anti Eagles! ill add this in if On the field of play a player KING HITS another that player retaliates dont both get sent and suspended depending on clean record and carry over points? Then some one please explain why nothing at all happened to the other party. Fair is Fair No matter what hat you have on this stinks.I agree with you Maverick.
The player has the right to appeal his sentence so he does have that avenue to go down if there are legitimate concerns over the decision of the judiciary.
And go back to the same people that sentenced him to another year on the sideline after he has spent most of this year watching. The same people that encouraged him to show up "and say we don't we want to see you on the sideline"

Yeah that will work :cstars:

The kid got out of a hospital bed to make it right and this is how he is treated :angry:
Edited by Maverick, Jun 29 2013, 05:19 PM.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
tc6_11
Member Avatar
NRL
[ *  *  *  * ]
BD, unlike others on here, I won't rubbish you. You are a tireless volunteer, and we aren't going to agree on this one, But you are wrong on this one. They didn't get into a "scrap", our guy was attacked. Standing, Nick Thomas has obviously been confused with Craig Moustakas.
Mav, what's him being in hospital got to do with anything? Should we feel sorry for him because he was sick?
Anyways, this has been given more air than it deserves. The guilty party has been dealt with, situation over.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Blue Devil
NRL
[ *  *  *  * ]
tc6_11
Jun 29 2013, 07:04 PM
BD, unlike others on here, I won't rubbish you. You are a tireless volunteer, and we aren't going to agree on this one, But you are wrong on this one. They didn't get into a "scrap", our guy was attacked. Standing, Nick Thomas has obviously been confused with Craig Moustakas.
Mav, what's him being in hospital got to do with anything? Should we feel sorry for him because he was sick?
Anyways, this has been given more air than it deserves. The guilty party has been dealt with, situation over.
If your going to defend a hearing that had NO witnesses against the Two players, the person involved did not attend, and two statements given had facts that sounded like they wernt even there. How did Nick Thomas got bought into it, he wasn't there, and no Moustakas wasn't mixed up as Thomas as Moustakas was named. And every person had told me Brad Hopkins got OUT of the car and hit Jarryd.

Like I said before, I heard through people that was present and seen what happened, they where not part of our club.

You have 2 people that had to defend them selves and where given guilty no matter who did and didn't attend, yet another person that did not have to show up and was innocent from the start.

It doesn't sound like a fair hearing, but are we surprised? After the way our club was ousted not really, and yes we showed proof of juniors like you clubs wanted but hey let's throw a new rule in, they don't have a junior club. Doing this your comp has lost a lot of Credibility!

I suppose it hurt Group 6 to see Campbelltown clubs dominate Grand finals last year, play in our competition but don't dare to win it.
Edited by Blue Devil, Jun 29 2013, 08:20 PM.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
tc6_11
Member Avatar
NRL
[ *  *  *  * ]
Blue Devil
Jun 29 2013, 08:18 PM
tc6_11
Jun 29 2013, 07:04 PM
BD, unlike others on here, I won't rubbish you. You are a tireless volunteer, and we aren't going to agree on this one, But you are wrong on this one. They didn't get into a "scrap", our guy was attacked. Standing, Nick Thomas has obviously been confused with Craig Moustakas.
Mav, what's him being in hospital got to do with anything? Should we feel sorry for him because he was sick?
Anyways, this has been given more air than it deserves. The guilty party has been dealt with, situation over.
If your going to defend a hearing that had NO witnesses against the Two players, the person involved did not attend, and two statements given had facts that sounded like they wernt even there. How did Nick Thomas got bought into it, he wasn't there, and no Moustakas wasn't mixed up as Thomas as Moustakas was named. And every person had told me Brad Hopkins got OUT of the car and hit Jarryd.

Like I said before, I heard through people that was present and seen what happened, they where not part of our club.

You have 2 people that had to defend them selves and where given guilty no matter who did and didn't attend, yet another person that did not have to show up and was innocent from the start.

It doesn't sound like a fair hearing, but are we surprised? After the way our club was ousted not really, and yes we showed proof of juniors like you clubs wanted but hey let's throw a new rule in, they don't have a junior club. Doing this your comp has lost a lot of Credibility!

I suppose it hurt Group 6 to see Campbelltown clubs dominate Grand finals last year, play in our competition but don't dare to win it.
I won't have an opinion on the hearing as like most i wasnt there, so I know nothing about it.
But penalty is sufficient
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Black&White
Member Avatar
NRL
[ *  *  *  * ]
tc6_11
Jun 29 2013, 08:25 PM
Blue Devil
Jun 29 2013, 08:18 PM
tc6_11
Jun 29 2013, 07:04 PM
BD, unlike others on here, I won't rubbish you. You are a tireless volunteer, and we aren't going to agree on this one, But you are wrong on this one. They didn't get into a "scrap", our guy was attacked. Standing, Nick Thomas has obviously been confused with Craig Moustakas.
Mav, what's him being in hospital got to do with anything? Should we feel sorry for him because he was sick?
Anyways, this has been given more air than it deserves. The guilty party has been dealt with, situation over.
If your going to defend a hearing that had NO witnesses against the Two players, the person involved did not attend, and two statements given had facts that sounded like they wernt even there. How did Nick Thomas got bought into it, he wasn't there, and no Moustakas wasn't mixed up as Thomas as Moustakas was named. And every person had told me Brad Hopkins got OUT of the car and hit Jarryd.

Like I said before, I heard through people that was present and seen what happened, they where not part of our club.

You have 2 people that had to defend them selves and where given guilty no matter who did and didn't attend, yet another person that did not have to show up and was innocent from the start.

It doesn't sound like a fair hearing, but are we surprised? After the way our club was ousted not really, and yes we showed proof of juniors like you clubs wanted but hey let's throw a new rule in, they don't have a junior club. Doing this your comp has lost a lot of Credibility!

I suppose it hurt Group 6 to see Campbelltown clubs dominate Grand finals last year, play in our competition but don't dare to win it.
I won't have an opinion on the hearing as like most i wasnt there, so I know nothing about it.
But penalty is sufficient
What's the old saying, "do the crime do the time."

Why not appeal if there is grounds? If your evidence was not allowed to be entered then follow the process and put an appeal in.

If you don't believe you are being given a "fair" hearing appeal higher.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Glitznglam
SG Ball
[ *  * ]
tc6_11
Jun 29 2013, 08:25 PM
Blue Devil
Jun 29 2013, 08:18 PM
tc6_11
Jun 29 2013, 07:04 PM
BD, unlike others on here, I won't rubbish you. You are a tireless volunteer, and we aren't going to agree on this one, But you are wrong on this one. They didn't get into a "scrap", our guy was attacked. Standing, Nick Thomas has obviously been confused with Craig Moustakas.
Mav, what's him being in hospital got to do with anything? Should we feel sorry for him because he was sick?
Anyways, this has been given more air than it deserves. The guilty party has been dealt with, situation over.
If your going to defend a hearing that had NO witnesses against the Two players, the person involved did not attend, and two statements given had facts that sounded like they wernt even there. How did Nick Thomas got bought into it, he wasn't there, and no Moustakas wasn't mixed up as Thomas as Moustakas was named. And every person had told me Brad Hopkins got OUT of the car and hit Jarryd.

Like I said before, I heard through people that was present and seen what happened, they where not part of our club.

You have 2 people that had to defend them selves and where given guilty no matter who did and didn't attend, yet another person that did not have to show up and was innocent from the start.

It doesn't sound like a fair hearing, but are we surprised? After the way our club was ousted not really, and yes we showed proof of juniors like you clubs wanted but hey let's throw a new rule in, they don't have a junior club. Doing this your comp has lost a lot of Credibility!

I suppose it hurt Group 6 to see Campbelltown clubs dominate Grand finals last year, play in our competition but don't dare to win it.
I won't have an opinion on the hearing as like most i wasnt there, so I know nothing about it.
But penalty is sufficient
BD can you confirm whether the other player that fronted the hearing was given an extra 6 months for trying to fight his case and they didn't appreciate it, and if so why have a hearing if your not aloud an oppinion its Disgusting the way it is being dealt with
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Blue Devil
NRL
[ *  *  *  * ]
Black&White
Jun 29 2013, 08:41 PM
tc6_11
Jun 29 2013, 08:25 PM
Blue Devil
Jun 29 2013, 08:18 PM
tc6_11
Jun 29 2013, 07:04 PM
BD, unlike others on here, I won't rubbish you. You are a tireless volunteer, and we aren't going to agree on this one, But you are wrong on this one. They didn't get into a "scrap", our guy was attacked. Standing, Nick Thomas has obviously been confused with Craig Moustakas.
Mav, what's him being in hospital got to do with anything? Should we feel sorry for him because he was sick?
Anyways, this has been given more air than it deserves. The guilty party has been dealt with, situation over.
If your going to defend a hearing that had NO witnesses against the Two players, the person involved did not attend, and two statements given had facts that sounded like they wernt even there. How did Nick Thomas got bought into it, he wasn't there, and no Moustakas wasn't mixed up as Thomas as Moustakas was named. And every person had told me Brad Hopkins got OUT of the car and hit Jarryd.

Like I said before, I heard through people that was present and seen what happened, they where not part of our club.

You have 2 people that had to defend them selves and where given guilty no matter who did and didn't attend, yet another person that did not have to show up and was innocent from the start.

It doesn't sound like a fair hearing, but are we surprised? After the way our club was ousted not really, and yes we showed proof of juniors like you clubs wanted but hey let's throw a new rule in, they don't have a junior club. Doing this your comp has lost a lot of Credibility!

I suppose it hurt Group 6 to see Campbelltown clubs dominate Grand finals last year, play in our competition but don't dare to win it.
I won't have an opinion on the hearing as like most i wasnt there, so I know nothing about it.
But penalty is sufficient
What's the old saying, "do the crime do the time."

Why not appeal if there is grounds? If your evidence was not allowed to be entered then follow the process and put an appeal in.

If you don't believe you are being given a "fair" hearing appeal higher.
So what are you saying about the person who done the crime but has been given no time? :dunno: and poor Nick Thomas that wasn't even there and has been stood down, his done no crime and is doing time. :dunno: if your going to sit a hearing, at least do it right! Wasn't the Lett's hearing a shambles as well, didn't he get it reduced on appeal?

Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Blue Devil
NRL
[ *  *  *  * ]
Glitznglam
Jun 29 2013, 08:51 PM
tc6_11
Jun 29 2013, 08:25 PM
Blue Devil
Jun 29 2013, 08:18 PM
tc6_11
Jun 29 2013, 07:04 PM
BD, unlike others on here, I won't rubbish you. You are a tireless volunteer, and we aren't going to agree on this one, But you are wrong on this one. They didn't get into a "scrap", our guy was attacked. Standing, Nick Thomas has obviously been confused with Craig Moustakas.
Mav, what's him being in hospital got to do with anything? Should we feel sorry for him because he was sick?
Anyways, this has been given more air than it deserves. The guilty party has been dealt with, situation over.
If your going to defend a hearing that had NO witnesses against the Two players, the person involved did not attend, and two statements given had facts that sounded like they wernt even there. How did Nick Thomas got bought into it, he wasn't there, and no Moustakas wasn't mixed up as Thomas as Moustakas was named. And every person had told me Brad Hopkins got OUT of the car and hit Jarryd.

Like I said before, I heard through people that was present and seen what happened, they where not part of our club.

You have 2 people that had to defend them selves and where given guilty no matter who did and didn't attend, yet another person that did not have to show up and was innocent from the start.

It doesn't sound like a fair hearing, but are we surprised? After the way our club was ousted not really, and yes we showed proof of juniors like you clubs wanted but hey let's throw a new rule in, they don't have a junior club. Doing this your comp has lost a lot of Credibility!

I suppose it hurt Group 6 to see Campbelltown clubs dominate Grand finals last year, play in our competition but don't dare to win it.
I won't have an opinion on the hearing as like most i wasnt there, so I know nothing about it.
But penalty is sufficient
BD can you confirm whether the other player that fronted the hearing was given an extra 6 months for trying to fight his case and they didn't appreciate it, and if so why have a hearing if your not aloud an oppinion its Disgusting the way it is being dealt with
Yes it's true, he got an extra 6 months for arguing his case, apparently your not allowed to talk at a hearing, you have to sit there and be told what ever is put in front of you is factual!
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Black&White
Member Avatar
NRL
[ *  *  *  * ]
Blue Devil
Jun 29 2013, 08:58 PM
Black&White
Jun 29 2013, 08:41 PM
tc6_11
Jun 29 2013, 08:25 PM
Blue Devil
Jun 29 2013, 08:18 PM
tc6_11
Jun 29 2013, 07:04 PM
BD, unlike others on here, I won't rubbish you. You are a tireless volunteer, and we aren't going to agree on this one, But you are wrong on this one. They didn't get into a "scrap", our guy was attacked. Standing, Nick Thomas has obviously been confused with Craig Moustakas.
Mav, what's him being in hospital got to do with anything? Should we feel sorry for him because he was sick?
Anyways, this has been given more air than it deserves. The guilty party has been dealt with, situation over.
If your going to defend a hearing that had NO witnesses against the Two players, the person involved did not attend, and two statements given had facts that sounded like they wernt even there. How did Nick Thomas got bought into it, he wasn't there, and no Moustakas wasn't mixed up as Thomas as Moustakas was named. And every person had told me Brad Hopkins got OUT of the car and hit Jarryd.

Like I said before, I heard through people that was present and seen what happened, they where not part of our club.

You have 2 people that had to defend them selves and where given guilty no matter who did and didn't attend, yet another person that did not have to show up and was innocent from the start.

It doesn't sound like a fair hearing, but are we surprised? After the way our club was ousted not really, and yes we showed proof of juniors like you clubs wanted but hey let's throw a new rule in, they don't have a junior club. Doing this your comp has lost a lot of Credibility!

I suppose it hurt Group 6 to see Campbelltown clubs dominate Grand finals last year, play in our competition but don't dare to win it.
I won't have an opinion on the hearing as like most i wasnt there, so I know nothing about it.
But penalty is sufficient
What's the old saying, "do the crime do the time."

Why not appeal if there is grounds? If your evidence was not allowed to be entered then follow the process and put an appeal in.

If you don't believe you are being given a "fair" hearing appeal higher.
So what are you saying about the person who done the crime but has been given no time? :dunno: and poor Nick Thomas that wasn't even there and has been stood down, his done no crime and is doing time. :dunno: if your going to sit a hearing, at least do it right! Wasn't the Lett's hearing a shambles as well, didn't he get it reduced on appeal?

Has your player appealed then?
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · CRL Group 6 · Next Topic »
Locked Topic


www.wests.co.nr is an unofficial forum run by volunteer Rugby League Supporters
Posts, messages, views, expressions or opinions on this forum DO NOT represent the official view of ANY Football Club.

Free Domains Hosting at .co.nr