|
Season 2013
|
|
Topic Started: Oct 12 2012, 07:38 PM (235,937 Views)
|
|
disco stu
|
Jun 29 2013, 09:15 PM
Post #2441
|
- Posts:
- 2,518
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #142
- Joined:
- 31 March 2007
|
Letts hearing also didn't take up long winded posts on this forum either, picton copped it on the chin and put it behind them, shame others can't show such character.
|
|
|
| |
|
tc6_11
|
Jun 30 2013, 09:38 AM
Post #2442
|
- Posts:
- 1,356
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,627
- Joined:
- 29 April 2010
|
- Blue Devil
- Jun 29 2013, 08:58 PM
- Black&White
- Jun 29 2013, 08:41 PM
- tc6_11
- Jun 29 2013, 08:25 PM
- Blue Devil
- Jun 29 2013, 08:18 PM
- tc6_11
- Jun 29 2013, 07:04 PM
BD, unlike others on here, I won't rubbish you. You are a tireless volunteer, and we aren't going to agree on this one, But you are wrong on this one. They didn't get into a "scrap", our guy was attacked. Standing, Nick Thomas has obviously been confused with Craig Moustakas. Mav, what's him being in hospital got to do with anything? Should we feel sorry for him because he was sick? Anyways, this has been given more air than it deserves. The guilty party has been dealt with, situation over.
If your going to defend a hearing that had NO witnesses against the Two players, the person involved did not attend, and two statements given had facts that sounded like they wernt even there. How did Nick Thomas got bought into it, he wasn't there, and no Moustakas wasn't mixed up as Thomas as Moustakas was named. And every person had told me Brad Hopkins got OUT of the car and hit Jarryd. Like I said before, I heard through people that was present and seen what happened, they where not part of our club. You have 2 people that had to defend them selves and where given guilty no matter who did and didn't attend, yet another person that did not have to show up and was innocent from the start. It doesn't sound like a fair hearing, but are we surprised? After the way our club was ousted not really, and yes we showed proof of juniors like you clubs wanted but hey let's throw a new rule in, they don't have a junior club. Doing this your comp has lost a lot of Credibility! I suppose it hurt Group 6 to see Campbelltown clubs dominate Grand finals last year, play in our competition but don't dare to win it.
I won't have an opinion on the hearing as like most i wasnt there, so I know nothing about it. But penalty is sufficient
What's the old saying, "do the crime do the time." Why not appeal if there is grounds? If your evidence was not allowed to be entered then follow the process and put an appeal in. If you don't believe you are being given a "fair" hearing appeal higher.
Wasn't the Lett's hearing a shambles as well, didn't he get it reduced on appeal? I was talking about Pete, not Michael. I didn't agree with the judicial process, but at the end of the day Pete did the wrong thing. He received a reduction for pleading guilty, which was 12 months + 6 games
|
|
|
| |
|
Glitznglam
|
Jun 30 2013, 12:06 PM
Post #2443
|
- Posts:
- 101
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,996
- Joined:
- 20 May 2012
|
- tc6_11
- Jun 30 2013, 09:38 AM
- Blue Devil
- Jun 29 2013, 08:58 PM
- Black&White
- Jun 29 2013, 08:41 PM
- tc6_11
- Jun 29 2013, 08:25 PM
- Blue Devil
- Jun 29 2013, 08:18 PM
- tc6_11
- Jun 29 2013, 07:04 PM
BD, unlike others on here, I won't rubbish you. You are a tireless volunteer, and we aren't going to agree on this one, But you are wrong on this one. They didn't get into a "scrap", our guy was attacked. Standing, Nick Thomas has obviously been confused with Craig Moustakas. Mav, what's him being in hospital got to do with anything? Should we feel sorry for him because he was sick? Anyways, this has been given more air than it deserves. The guilty party has been dealt with, situation over.
If your going to defend a hearing that had NO witnesses against the Two players, the person involved did not attend, and two statements given had facts that sounded like they wernt even there. How did Nick Thomas got bought into it, he wasn't there, and no Moustakas wasn't mixed up as Thomas as Moustakas was named. And every person had told me Brad Hopkins got OUT of the car and hit Jarryd. Like I said before, I heard through people that was present and seen what happened, they where not part of our club. You have 2 people that had to defend them selves and where given guilty no matter who did and didn't attend, yet another person that did not have to show up and was innocent from the start. It doesn't sound like a fair hearing, but are we surprised? After the way our club was ousted not really, and yes we showed proof of juniors like you clubs wanted but hey let's throw a new rule in, they don't have a junior club. Doing this your comp has lost a lot of Credibility! I suppose it hurt Group 6 to see Campbelltown clubs dominate Grand finals last year, play in our competition but don't dare to win it.
I won't have an opinion on the hearing as like most i wasnt there, so I know nothing about it. But penalty is sufficient
What's the old saying, "do the crime do the time." Why not appeal if there is grounds? If your evidence was not allowed to be entered then follow the process and put an appeal in. If you don't believe you are being given a "fair" hearing appeal higher.
Wasn't the Lett's hearing a shambles as well, didn't he get it reduced on appeal?
I was talking about Pete, not Michael. I didn't agree with the judicial process, but at the end of the day Pete did the wrong thing. He received a reduction for pleading guilty, which was 12 months + 6 games 2 years for pleading guilty and 2 and 1/2 years for arguing your case for fighting doesn't seem at all fair, seeing you only get a 2 year ban for performance inhancing drugs in the NRL. Still think it should of been heard at an independent hearing given the past and situation concerning the eagles team
|
|
|
| |
|
tc6_11
|
Jun 30 2013, 01:34 PM
Post #2444
|
- Posts:
- 1,356
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,627
- Joined:
- 29 April 2010
|
- Glitznglam
- Jun 30 2013, 12:06 PM
- tc6_11
- Jun 30 2013, 09:38 AM
- Blue Devil
- Jun 29 2013, 08:58 PM
- Black&White
- Jun 29 2013, 08:41 PM
- tc6_11
- Jun 29 2013, 08:25 PM
- Blue Devil
- Jun 29 2013, 08:18 PM
- tc6_11
- Jun 29 2013, 07:04 PM
BD, unlike others on here, I won't rubbish you. You are a tireless volunteer, and we aren't going to agree on this one, But you are wrong on this one. They didn't get into a "scrap", our guy was attacked. Standing, Nick Thomas has obviously been confused with Craig Moustakas. Mav, what's him being in hospital got to do with anything? Should we feel sorry for him because he was sick? Anyways, this has been given more air than it deserves. The guilty party has been dealt with, situation over.
If your going to defend a hearing that had NO witnesses against the Two players, the person involved did not attend, and two statements given had facts that sounded like they wernt even there. How did Nick Thomas got bought into it, he wasn't there, and no Moustakas wasn't mixed up as Thomas as Moustakas was named. And every person had told me Brad Hopkins got OUT of the car and hit Jarryd. Like I said before, I heard through people that was present and seen what happened, they where not part of our club. You have 2 people that had to defend them selves and where given guilty no matter who did and didn't attend, yet another person that did not have to show up and was innocent from the start. It doesn't sound like a fair hearing, but are we surprised? After the way our club was ousted not really, and yes we showed proof of juniors like you clubs wanted but hey let's throw a new rule in, they don't have a junior club. Doing this your comp has lost a lot of Credibility! I suppose it hurt Group 6 to see Campbelltown clubs dominate Grand finals last year, play in our competition but don't dare to win it.
I won't have an opinion on the hearing as like most i wasnt there, so I know nothing about it. But penalty is sufficient
What's the old saying, "do the crime do the time." Why not appeal if there is grounds? If your evidence was not allowed to be entered then follow the process and put an appeal in. If you don't believe you are being given a "fair" hearing appeal higher.
Wasn't the Lett's hearing a shambles as well, didn't he get it reduced on appeal?
I was talking about Pete, not Michael. I didn't agree with the judicial process, but at the end of the day Pete did the wrong thing. He received a reduction for pleading guilty, which was 12 months + 6 games
2 years for pleading guilty and 2 and 1/2 years for arguing your case for fighting doesn't seem at all fair, seeing you only get a 2 year ban for performance inhancing drugs in the NRL. Still think it should of been heard at an independent hearing given the past and situation concerning the eagles team If there is a genuine case, appeal to CRL
|
|
|
| |
|
Glitznglam
|
Jun 30 2013, 02:34 PM
Post #2445
|
- Posts:
- 101
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,996
- Joined:
- 20 May 2012
|
- tc6_11
- Jun 30 2013, 01:34 PM
- Glitznglam
- Jun 30 2013, 12:06 PM
- tc6_11
- Jun 30 2013, 09:38 AM
- Blue Devil
- Jun 29 2013, 08:58 PM
- Black&White
- Jun 29 2013, 08:41 PM
- tc6_11
- Jun 29 2013, 08:25 PM
- Blue Devil
- Jun 29 2013, 08:18 PM
- tc6_11
- Jun 29 2013, 07:04 PM
BD, unlike others on here, I won't rubbish you. You are a tireless volunteer, and we aren't going to agree on this one, But you are wrong on this one. They didn't get into a "scrap", our guy was attacked. Standing, Nick Thomas has obviously been confused with Craig Moustakas. Mav, what's him being in hospital got to do with anything? Should we feel sorry for him because he was sick? Anyways, this has been given more air than it deserves. The guilty party has been dealt with, situation over.
If your going to defend a hearing that had NO witnesses against the Two players, the person involved did not attend, and two statements given had facts that sounded like they wernt even there. How did Nick Thomas got bought into it, he wasn't there, and no Moustakas wasn't mixed up as Thomas as Moustakas was named. And every person had told me Brad Hopkins got OUT of the car and hit Jarryd. Like I said before, I heard through people that was present and seen what happened, they where not part of our club. You have 2 people that had to defend them selves and where given guilty no matter who did and didn't attend, yet another person that did not have to show up and was innocent from the start. It doesn't sound like a fair hearing, but are we surprised? After the way our club was ousted not really, and yes we showed proof of juniors like you clubs wanted but hey let's throw a new rule in, they don't have a junior club. Doing this your comp has lost a lot of Credibility! I suppose it hurt Group 6 to see Campbelltown clubs dominate Grand finals last year, play in our competition but don't dare to win it.
I won't have an opinion on the hearing as like most i wasnt there, so I know nothing about it. But penalty is sufficient
What's the old saying, "do the crime do the time." Why not appeal if there is grounds? If your evidence was not allowed to be entered then follow the process and put an appeal in. If you don't believe you are being given a "fair" hearing appeal higher.
Wasn't the Lett's hearing a shambles as well, didn't he get it reduced on appeal?
I was talking about Pete, not Michael. I didn't agree with the judicial process, but at the end of the day Pete did the wrong thing. He received a reduction for pleading guilty, which was 12 months + 6 games
2 years for pleading guilty and 2 and 1/2 years for arguing your case for fighting doesn't seem at all fair, seeing you only get a 2 year ban for performance inhancing drugs in the NRL. Still think it should of been heard at an independent hearing given the past and situation concerning the eagles team
If there is a genuine case, appeal to CRL Well is there a genuine reason to appeal from what has been said there was no witnesses at the hearing and the statements that were supplied to the board had identified a person who was in the fight wasn't even at the game nor been involved with the players questioned for a couple of years very confusing.
|
|
|
| |
|
pastrami
|
Jun 30 2013, 08:04 PM
Post #2446
|
- Posts:
- 206
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #2,159
- Joined:
- 12 February 2013
|
The adage: 'paying for the sins of the father' certainly apply.. eagles are tainted with anything they touch or want to be involved in. NSWRL and CRL keeping a close eye on the situation and are not forgiving or forgetting.
Any hope for the future is for officials to be set adrift, a new committee and admin set up and certain conditions put in place before anyone will touch them with any barge pole.
|
|
|
| |
|
footylover
|
Jun 30 2013, 09:42 PM
Post #2447
|
- Posts:
- 264
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,728
- Joined:
- 16 March 2011
|
- pastrami
- Jun 30 2013, 08:04 PM
The adage: 'paying for the sins of the father' certainly apply.. eagles are tainted with anything they touch or want to be involved in. NSWRL and CRL keeping a close eye on the situation and are not forgiving or forgetting.
Any hope for the future is for officials to be set adrift, a new committee and admin set up and certain conditions put in place before anyone will touch them with any barge pole. So your saying two players paid for a vendetta against someone else ???
|
|
|
| |
|
Maverick
|
Jul 1 2013, 08:56 AM
Post #2448
|
- Posts:
- 1,081
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #526
- Joined:
- 14 April 2008
|
- pastrami
- Jun 30 2013, 08:04 PM
The adage: 'paying for the sins of the father' certainly apply.. eagles are tainted with anything they touch or want to be involved in. NSWRL and CRL keeping a close eye on the situation and are not forgiving or forgetting.
Any hope for the future is for officials to be set adrift, a new committee and admin set up and certain conditions put in place before anyone will touch them with any barge pole. Unlike Group 6 the SCC is trying to grow their competition into something bigger and better and would welcome new clubs to their fold. G6 proved they didn't want growth when the denied West's clubs to be part of their competition.
In an economy like we have at the moment and for quite a few years, I would have thought that taking the West's clubs on board and "managing" any situations that may have occurred would have strengthened the group and given them more teams and more players to pick from for representative duties. Take out the players you have, that have originally come from West's clubs and where would the groups strength be?
Its funny 3 years ago any player you spoke to wanted to be part of G6 as it was deemed in their minds as the best place to play.
I speak to many players in the current SCC comp and ask if they would go back to play in G6 and the answer in 2013 is now overwhelmingly "NO"
Any G6 official should ask themselves how this turnaround of attitude has happened in such a short period of time and what this change could mean for the future of G6. (crowd numbers should give some indication)
The main reasons West's players went to G6 in the past, was the lure of money and the opportunity to play in a well run comp. These options are now available to players in the SCC if the club wants to pay, they can, and the comp is managed well, with out any fights that I have seen in the last 2 years.
I think whether they think they were right or wrong, the Group has damaged their reputation badly by dismissing the Eagles and leaving 60 plus players out in the cold. Many have not come back to Rugby League at all and this loss of talent to the game has resulted in bad feelings for many years to come.
Lets see how many transfer out of G6 in 2014 only time will tell.
I made comments in 2011 the group should have taken on the West's clubs but was hailed down. All the best for your future G6 but IMO it doesn't look as bright as it once did.
N.B I also believe even the most hard line G6 supporter can get what I am saying, but how many would publicly admit it?
|
|
|
| |
|
Jetter
|
Jul 1 2013, 09:59 AM
Post #2449
|
- Posts:
- 341
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #702
- Joined:
- 13 August 2008
|
Well Mav, I have to disagree with you there but the facts speak for themselves.
Group 6 has 4 reps in Country team, could have been 5. Group 6 rep team just missed out on Country Championship finals by 2 points, which Gr 7 won. Campbelltown City are currently 4th and rebuilding Moss Vale re-enter First Grade and whilst they haven't forfeited every other team has been competitive.
On the other hand, where do Wests teams play?? How many Wests A Grade teams exist?
I think most clubs are happy for any Wests clubs to want to join but it was on Group 6 and clubs terms. Eagles have left a bitter taste in everyone's mouths whereas Kangaroos to their credit have done everything to fit in and work with other clubs.
|
|
|
| |
|
Glitznglam
|
Jul 1 2013, 10:22 AM
Post #2450
|
- Posts:
- 101
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,996
- Joined:
- 20 May 2012
|
- Jetter
- Jul 1 2013, 09:59 AM
Well Mav, I have to disagree with you there but the facts speak for themselves.
Group 6 has 4 reps in Country team, could have been 5. Group 6 rep team just missed out on Country Championship finals by 2 points, which Gr 7 won. Campbelltown City are currently 4th and rebuilding Moss Vale re-enter First Grade and whilst they haven't forfeited every other team has been competitive.
On the other hand, where do Wests teams play?? How many Wests A Grade teams exist?
I think most clubs are happy for any Wests clubs to want to join but it was on Group 6 and clubs terms. Eagles have left a bitter taste in everyone's mouths whereas Kangaroos to their credit have done everything to fit in and work with other clubs.
I do believe that out of those players that are representing group 6 a couple of them had come from east haven't they
|
|
|
| |
|
Goodbuddy
|
Jul 1 2013, 10:26 AM
Post #2451
|
- Posts:
- 27
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #2,104
- Joined:
- 3 November 2012
|
Why does these east comments not get deleted?? Get over it. It's repetitive and boring
|
|
|
| |
|
Black&White
|
Jul 1 2013, 10:59 AM
Post #2452
|
- Posts:
- 1,130
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,442
- Joined:
- 28 May 2009
|
- Maverick
- Jul 1 2013, 08:56 AM
- pastrami
- Jun 30 2013, 08:04 PM
The adage: 'paying for the sins of the father' certainly apply.. eagles are tainted with anything they touch or want to be involved in. NSWRL and CRL keeping a close eye on the situation and are not forgiving or forgetting.
Any hope for the future is for officials to be set adrift, a new committee and admin set up and certain conditions put in place before anyone will touch them with any barge pole.
Unlike Group 6 the SCC is trying to grow their competition into something bigger and better and would welcome new clubs to their fold. G6 proved they didn't want growth when the denied West's clubs to be part of their competition. In an economy like we have at the moment and for quite a few years, I would have thought that taking the West's clubs on board and "managing" any situations that may have occurred would have strengthened the group and given them more teams and more players to pick from for representative duties. Take out the players you have, that have originally come from West's clubs and where would the groups strength be? Its funny 3 years ago any player you spoke to wanted to be part of G6 as it was deemed in their minds as the best place to play. I speak to many players in the current SCC comp and ask if they would go back to play in G6 and the answer in 2013 is now overwhelmingly "NO" Any G6 official should ask themselves how this turnaround of attitude has happened in such a short period of time and what this change could mean for the future of G6. (crowd numbers should give some indication) The main reasons West's players went to G6 in the past, was the lure of money and the opportunity to play in a well run comp. These options are now available to players in the SCC if the club wants to pay, they can, and the comp is managed well, with out any fights that I have seen in the last 2 years. I think whether they think they were right or wrong, the Group has damaged there reputation badly by dismissing the Eagles and leaving 60 plus players out in the cold. Many have not come back to Rugby League at all and this loss of talent to the game has resulted in bad feelings for many years to come. Lets see how many transfer out of G6 in 2014 only time will tell. I made comments in 2011 the group should have taken on the West's clubs but was hailed down. All the best for your future G6 but IMO it doesn't look as bright as it once did. N.B I also believe even the most hard line G6 supporter can get what I am saying, but how many would publicly admit it? Mav you've made your feelings about Group 6 perfectly clear time and time again. Your club isn't in the comp which you're very happy about and your club is in the best comp of all.
Great, I'm sure we're all happy for you.
What I don't understand is why you feel the need to continue to "pick at the scab". The issue is over and the majority here are happy to let it go. The Eagles are not in Group 6 so discussion about them doesn't belong on this thread.
Why don't you use the Wests thread to grind your axe and leave the Group 6 one free for actual discussion on the comp.
Or we could start a new thread just for the Eagles..............
|
|
|
| |
|
Maverick
|
Jul 1 2013, 11:02 AM
Post #2453
|
- Posts:
- 1,081
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #526
- Joined:
- 14 April 2008
|
- Goodbuddy
- Jul 1 2013, 10:26 AM
Why does these east comments not get deleted?? Get over it. It's repetitive and boring Because this is an open forum, and issue's relating to Rugby League in the Western Suburbs and Group 6 districts may be discussed by anybody according to the rules of this forum. Nobody has the right to delete a comment just because they may or may not like it. Deleting a comment is supposed to be to stop comments that may end up causing legal ramifications and or personal vilifications.
|
|
|
| |
|
disco stu
|
Jul 1 2013, 11:08 AM
Post #2454
|
- Posts:
- 2,518
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #142
- Joined:
- 31 March 2007
|
- Maverick
- Jul 1 2013, 11:02 AM
- Goodbuddy
- Jul 1 2013, 10:26 AM
Why does these east comments not get deleted?? Get over it. It's repetitive and boring
Because this is an open forum, and issue's relating to Rugby League in the Western Suburbs and Group 6 districts may be discussed by anybody according to the rules of this forum. Nobody has the right to delete a comment just because they may or may not like it. Deleting a comment is supposed to be to stop comments that may end up causing legal ramifications and or personal vilifications. The "issue" is no longer, cant change history so why continue with the rhetoric?, everyone else is moving on, yet a few wont let it go, build a bridge.
Flogging a dead horse IMO.
|
|
|
| |
|
Maverick
|
Jul 1 2013, 11:24 AM
Post #2455
|
- Posts:
- 1,081
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #526
- Joined:
- 14 April 2008
|
- Black&White
- Jul 1 2013, 10:59 AM
- Maverick
- Jul 1 2013, 08:56 AM
- pastrami
- Jun 30 2013, 08:04 PM
The adage: 'paying for the sins of the father' certainly apply.. eagles are tainted with anything they touch or want to be involved in. NSWRL and CRL keeping a close eye on the situation and are not forgiving or forgetting.
Any hope for the future is for officials to be set adrift, a new committee and admin set up and certain conditions put in place before anyone will touch them with any barge pole.
Unlike Group 6 the SCC is trying to grow their competition into something bigger and better and would welcome new clubs to their fold. G6 proved they didn't want growth when the denied West's clubs to be part of their competition. In an economy like we have at the moment and for quite a few years, I would have thought that taking the West's clubs on board and "managing" any situations that may have occurred would have strengthened the group and given them more teams and more players to pick from for representative duties. Take out the players you have, that have originally come from West's clubs and where would the groups strength be? Its funny 3 years ago any player you spoke to wanted to be part of G6 as it was deemed in their minds as the best place to play. I speak to many players in the current SCC comp and ask if they would go back to play in G6 and the answer in 2013 is now overwhelmingly "NO" Any G6 official should ask themselves how this turnaround of attitude has happened in such a short period of time and what this change could mean for the future of G6. (crowd numbers should give some indication) The main reasons West's players went to G6 in the past, was the lure of money and the opportunity to play in a well run comp. These options are now available to players in the SCC if the club wants to pay, they can, and the comp is managed well, with out any fights that I have seen in the last 2 years. I think whether they think they were right or wrong, the Group has damaged there reputation badly by dismissing the Eagles and leaving 60 plus players out in the cold. Many have not come back to Rugby League at all and this loss of talent to the game has resulted in bad feelings for many years to come. Lets see how many transfer out of G6 in 2014 only time will tell. I made comments in 2011 the group should have taken on the West's clubs but was hailed down. All the best for your future G6 but IMO it doesn't look as bright as it once did. N.B I also believe even the most hard line G6 supporter can get what I am saying, but how many would publicly admit it?
Mav you've made your feelings about Group 6 perfectly clear time and time again. Your club isn't in the comp which you're very happy about and your club is in the best comp of all. Great, I'm sure we're all happy for you. What I don't understand is why you feel the need to continue to "pick at the scab". The issue is over and the majority here are happy to let it go. The Eagles are not in Group 6 so discussion about them doesn't belong on this thread. Why don't you use the Wests thread to grind your axe and leave the Group 6 one free for actual discussion on the comp. Or we could start a new thread just for the Eagles.............. I would have thought it was "Pastrami" reignited "picking the scab" not me. I responded to "his" comment.
You obviously don't read all of what is stated as I never once stated we had a better comp than you. I simply made an observation that our comp is "growing" and IMO your comp doesn't seem have the same esteem as it used to have. Smart people would take opinions like this and find out if others feel the same. If so use the information and make things better.
|
|
|
| |
|
Glitznglam
|
Jul 1 2013, 12:43 PM
Post #2456
|
- Posts:
- 101
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,996
- Joined:
- 20 May 2012
|
- disco stu
- Jul 1 2013, 11:08 AM
- Maverick
- Jul 1 2013, 11:02 AM
- Goodbuddy
- Jul 1 2013, 10:26 AM
Why does these east comments not get deleted?? Get over it. It's repetitive and boring
Because this is an open forum, and issue's relating to Rugby League in the Western Suburbs and Group 6 districts may be discussed by anybody according to the rules of this forum. Nobody has the right to delete a comment just because they may or may not like it. Deleting a comment is supposed to be to stop comments that may end up causing legal ramifications and or personal vilifications.
The "issue" is no longer, cant change history so why continue with the rhetoric?, everyone else is moving on, yet a few wont let it go, build a bridge. Flogging a dead horse IMO.  Yes very true but is going both ways group commitee won't let go just as much as east fans players and officials, don't understand why they won't give the judicial hearing to an independent board instead of trying to hold on to it therefore east will no longer have a connection with group 6. It's like a battle to see who has the last say and football is the only one missing out
|
|
|
| |
|
Blue Devil
|
Jul 1 2013, 01:43 PM
Post #2457
|
- Posts:
- 1,049
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #1,513
- Joined:
- 1 September 2009
|
- Jetter
- Jul 1 2013, 09:59 AM
Well Mav, I have to disagree with you there but the facts speak for themselves.
Group 6 has 4 reps in Country team, could have been 5. Group 6 rep team just missed out on Country Championship finals by 2 points, which Gr 7 won. Campbelltown City are currently 4th and rebuilding Moss Vale re-enter First Grade and whilst they haven't forfeited every other team has been competitive.
On the other hand, where do Wests teams play?? How many Wests A Grade teams exist?
I think most clubs are happy for any Wests clubs to want to join but it was on Group 6 and clubs terms. Eagles have left a bitter taste in everyone's mouths whereas Kangaroos to their credit have done everything to fit in and work with other clubs.
Be real Jetter, you say work in with Group 6 please, you guys register an ex NRL player and that's OK, we transfer a player from your club to fill the shoes of a couple players we lost and a 46 year rule that hasn't been used popped out to stop us.
We again have to go to every extreme to prove Juniors and do so and another rule pops out that we don't have a junior club!
Realistically City don't have a problem as they are not at the top of the table, but we all know they will have if they ever get to the side we had, and talk to anyone on the streets and yes this is what they are saying.
Our problems came winning the Grand Final undefeated last year, we had people saying this at the Grand Final last year that we wouldn't be in the comp this year, we just didn't think the Group would be so gutless to do it the way they did!
You have 3 teams competing for the Premiership and look at the talent you have lost from you comp, look at others teams points and your club included and see plenty of mates rates!
We didn't want mates rates, we just wanted the same rules as everyone else, but as said to us by your group 6 President, "your a powerhouse club and I plan to fix that"
I would love to see Narellan be told you have NO junior club! Then see how you feel about the situation, I ask you Jetter, is East Campbelltown the junior club to Campbelltown Eagles?
I have said this before, your competition has lost credibility, I'm sure Group 6 players wanted to beat the best, but obviously Group 6 club officials didn't!
|
|
|
| |
|
disco stu
|
Jul 1 2013, 02:29 PM
Post #2458
|
- Posts:
- 2,518
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #142
- Joined:
- 31 March 2007
|
- Blue Devil
- Jul 1 2013, 01:43 PM
- Jetter
- Jul 1 2013, 09:59 AM
Well Mav, I have to disagree with you there but the facts speak for themselves.
Group 6 has 4 reps in Country team, could have been 5. Group 6 rep team just missed out on Country Championship finals by 2 points, which Gr 7 won. Campbelltown City are currently 4th and rebuilding Moss Vale re-enter First Grade and whilst they haven't forfeited every other team has been competitive.
On the other hand, where do Wests teams play?? How many Wests A Grade teams exist?
I think most clubs are happy for any Wests clubs to want to join but it was on Group 6 and clubs terms. Eagles have left a bitter taste in everyone's mouths whereas Kangaroos to their credit have done everything to fit in and work with other clubs.
Be real Jetter, you say work in with Group 6 please, you guys register an ex NRL player and that's OK, we transfer a player from your club to fill the shoes of a couple players we lost and a 46 year rule that hasn't been used popped out to stop us. We again have to go to every extreme to prove Juniors and do so and another rule pops out that we don't have a junior club! Realistically City don't have a problem as they are not at the top of the table, but we all know they will have if they ever get to the side we had, and talk to anyone on the streets and yes this is what they are saying. Our problems came winning the Grand Final undefeated last year, we had people saying this at the Grand Final last year that we wouldn't be in the comp this year, we just didn't think the Group would be so gutless to do it the way they did! You have 3 teams competing for the Premiership and look at the talent you have lost from you comp, look at others teams points and your club included and see plenty of mates rates! We didn't want mates rates, we just wanted the same rules as everyone else, but as said to us by your group 6 President, "your a powerhouse club and I plan to fix that" I would love to see Narellan be told you have NO junior club! Then see how you feel about the situation, I ask you Jetter, is East Campbelltown the junior club to Campbelltown Eagles? I have said this before, your competition has lost credibility, I'm sure Group 6 players wanted to beat the best, but obviously Group 6 club officials didn't! Here we go again, hijacking the thread and for what purpose ? why am I surprised
I think you lost all credibility hiding behind your various aliases spamming the forum with rhetoric & innuendo to be taken seriously or to have any empathy shown to your situation, you tried to take us all for fools, did you think we were that naive? Seriously what's done is done , you'll never move forward if your too consumed with the past .
|
|
|
| |
|
Brutus
|
Jul 1 2013, 03:09 PM
Post #2459
|
- Posts:
- 43
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #2,231
- Joined:
- 1 July 2013
|
- disco stu
- Jul 1 2013, 02:29 PM
- Blue Devil
- Jul 1 2013, 01:43 PM
- Jetter
- Jul 1 2013, 09:59 AM
Well Mav, I have to disagree with you there but the facts speak for themselves.
Group 6 has 4 reps in Country team, could have been 5. Group 6 rep team just missed out on Country Championship finals by 2 points, which Gr 7 won. Campbelltown City are currently 4th and rebuilding Moss Vale re-enter First Grade and whilst they haven't forfeited every other team has been competitive.
On the other hand, where do Wests teams play?? How many Wests A Grade teams exist?
I think most clubs are happy for any Wests clubs to want to join but it was on Group 6 and clubs terms. Eagles have left a bitter taste in everyone's mouths whereas Kangaroos to their credit have done everything to fit in and work with other clubs.
Be real Jetter, you say work in with Group 6 please, you guys register an ex NRL player and that's OK, we transfer a player from your club to fill the shoes of a couple players we lost and a 46 year rule that hasn't been used popped out to stop us. We again have to go to every extreme to prove Juniors and do so and another rule pops out that we don't have a junior club! Realistically City don't have a problem as they are not at the top of the table, but we all know they will have if they ever get to the side we had, and talk to anyone on the streets and yes this is what they are saying. Our problems came winning the Grand Final undefeated last year, we had people saying this at the Grand Final last year that we wouldn't be in the comp this year, we just didn't think the Group would be so gutless to do it the way they did! You have 3 teams competing for the Premiership and look at the talent you have lost from you comp, look at others teams points and your club included and see plenty of mates rates! We didn't want mates rates, we just wanted the same rules as everyone else, but as said to us by your group 6 President, "your a powerhouse club and I plan to fix that" I would love to see Narellan be told you have NO junior club! Then see how you feel about the situation, I ask you Jetter, is East Campbelltown the junior club to Campbelltown Eagles? I have said this before, your competition has lost credibility, I'm sure Group 6 players wanted to beat the best, but obviously Group 6 club officials didn't!
Here we go again, hijacking the thread and for what purpose ?  why am I surprised I think you lost all credibility hiding behind your various aliases spamming the forum with rhetoric & innuendo to be taken seriously or to have any empathy shown to your situation, you tried to take us all for fools, did you think we were that naive? Seriously what's done is done , you'll never move forward if your too consumed with the past . Blame anyone you want devil but its clear to see your the reason the club is in the position it's in.if you truly care about the club step away and give it a chance to rebuild and stop tarnishing it with your dirty name! No comp will touch eagles y your there. Ray Hadley wouldn't help you and he always sticks up for the hard done by. Stop whinging no one wants to hear it your worse than the boy who cried wolf!! This is a group 6 thread and last time I checked eagles and devils had nothing to do with it!!
|
|
|
| |
|
Blue Devil
|
Jul 1 2013, 04:02 PM
Post #2460
|
- Posts:
- 1,049
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #1,513
- Joined:
- 1 September 2009
|
- Brutus
- Jul 1 2013, 03:09 PM
- disco stu
- Jul 1 2013, 02:29 PM
- Blue Devil
- Jul 1 2013, 01:43 PM
- Jetter
- Jul 1 2013, 09:59 AM
Well Mav, I have to disagree with you there but the facts speak for themselves.
Group 6 has 4 reps in Country team, could have been 5. Group 6 rep team just missed out on Country Championship finals by 2 points, which Gr 7 won. Campbelltown City are currently 4th and rebuilding Moss Vale re-enter First Grade and whilst they haven't forfeited every other team has been competitive.
On the other hand, where do Wests teams play?? How many Wests A Grade teams exist?
I think most clubs are happy for any Wests clubs to want to join but it was on Group 6 and clubs terms. Eagles have left a bitter taste in everyone's mouths whereas Kangaroos to their credit have done everything to fit in and work with other clubs.
Be real Jetter, you say work in with Group 6 please, you guys register an ex NRL player and that's OK, we transfer a player from your club to fill the shoes of a couple players we lost and a 46 year rule that hasn't been used popped out to stop us. We again have to go to every extreme to prove Juniors and do so and another rule pops out that we don't have a junior club! Realistically City don't have a problem as they are not at the top of the table, but we all know they will have if they ever get to the side we had, and talk to anyone on the streets and yes this is what they are saying. Our problems came winning the Grand Final undefeated last year, we had people saying this at the Grand Final last year that we wouldn't be in the comp this year, we just didn't think the Group would be so gutless to do it the way they did! You have 3 teams competing for the Premiership and look at the talent you have lost from you comp, look at others teams points and your club included and see plenty of mates rates! We didn't want mates rates, we just wanted the same rules as everyone else, but as said to us by your group 6 President, "your a powerhouse club and I plan to fix that" I would love to see Narellan be told you have NO junior club! Then see how you feel about the situation, I ask you Jetter, is East Campbelltown the junior club to Campbelltown Eagles? I have said this before, your competition has lost credibility, I'm sure Group 6 players wanted to beat the best, but obviously Group 6 club officials didn't!
Here we go again, hijacking the thread and for what purpose ?  why am I surprised I think you lost all credibility hiding behind your various aliases spamming the forum with rhetoric & innuendo to be taken seriously or to have any empathy shown to your situation, you tried to take us all for fools, did you think we were that naive? Seriously what's done is done , you'll never move forward if your too consumed with the past .
Blame anyone you want devil but its clear to see your the reason the club is in the position it's in.if you truly care about the club step away and give it a chance to rebuild and stop tarnishing it with your dirty name! No comp will touch eagles y your there. Ray Hadley wouldn't help you and he always sticks up for the hard done by. Stop whinging no one wants to hear it your worse than the boy who cried wolf!! This is a group 6 thread and last time I checked eagles and devils had nothing to do with it!! I don't know what rock your been living under but there is NO Campbelltown Eagles RLFC so I don't need to stand down, you can't stand down when there's nothing to stand down too.
What are you afraid off?
|
|
|
| |