|
Season 2013
|
|
Topic Started: Oct 12 2012, 07:38 PM (235,973 Views)
|
|
pastrami
|
Apr 30 2013, 09:00 AM
Post #1721
|
- Posts:
- 206
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #2,159
- Joined:
- 12 February 2013
|
- mckormick
- Apr 29 2013, 10:38 PM
- New kid
- Apr 29 2013, 08:38 PM
The talk is their lowest pointed playrs would be 10points 37 players at 10points = 370 that isn't including 25 point players they have common sense is they can not field 3 teams and some weeks their 18s play away from reserves and first
PASTRAMI have a read of the above mate. Lol its not as easy as just getting on with it when you cant field 3 teams with the points allocated My point: it is not easy, but on the other hand not undo-able.
Why not drop U18s or Reserve Grade for a week till this gets resolved, or put on the sideline those big point players??? Not ideal but an option. Forfeiting ALL 3 grades was a last option in my opinion but it became the first option.
|
|
|
| |
|
footylover
|
Apr 30 2013, 09:17 AM
Post #1722
|
- Posts:
- 264
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,728
- Joined:
- 16 March 2011
|
- pastrami
- Apr 30 2013, 09:00 AM
- mckormick
- Apr 29 2013, 10:38 PM
- New kid
- Apr 29 2013, 08:38 PM
The talk is their lowest pointed playrs would be 10points 37 players at 10points = 370 that isn't including 25 point players they have common sense is they can not field 3 teams and some weeks their 18s play away from reserves and first
PASTRAMI have a read of the above mate. Lol its not as easy as just getting on with it when you cant field 3 teams with the points allocated
My point: it is not easy, but on the other hand not undo-able. Why not drop U18s or Reserve Grade for a week till this gets resolved, or put on the sideline those big point players??? Not ideal but an option. Forfeiting ALL 3 grades was a last option in my opinion but it became the first option. We sat the 18s out when we played thirlmere and got slammed by the group for doing it and were told they had to play every week ...
|
|
|
| |
|
observer
|
Apr 30 2013, 09:40 AM
Post #1723
|
- Posts:
- 96
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,558
- Joined:
- 30 January 2010
|
Does this mean that the statement some weeks ago that the Group had sought certification from the WSDJRL that Eagles players were East Campbelltown juniors was not accurate.
If the Eagles were deemed to be a separate club from East Campbelltown, why would the Group seek info from Wests administrators.
I note that the Wentworthville District Rugby League club has always run the NSW Cup, RMC and Sydney Shield teams whereas Wentworthville United RLC runs the approx 50 junior teams. Even though they are separately listed clubs all the seasons with the junior club are credited under the points system for RMC and SS.
|
|
|
| |
|
Glitznglam
|
Apr 30 2013, 11:28 AM
Post #1724
|
- Posts:
- 101
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,996
- Joined:
- 20 May 2012
|
- footylover
- Apr 30 2013, 09:17 AM
- pastrami
- Apr 30 2013, 09:00 AM
- mckormick
- Apr 29 2013, 10:38 PM
- New kid
- Apr 29 2013, 08:38 PM
The talk is their lowest pointed playrs would be 10points 37 players at 10points = 370 that isn't including 25 point players they have common sense is they can not field 3 teams and some weeks their 18s play away from reserves and first
PASTRAMI have a read of the above mate. Lol its not as easy as just getting on with it when you cant field 3 teams with the points allocated
My point: it is not easy, but on the other hand not undo-able. Why not drop U18s or Reserve Grade for a week till this gets resolved, or put on the sideline those big point players??? Not ideal but an option. Forfeiting ALL 3 grades was a last option in my opinion but it became the first option.
We sat the 18s out when we played thirlmere and got slammed by the group for doing it and were told they had to play every week ... Sounds like there are more holes in this so called point system, in which the group have no idea
|
|
|
| |
|
Glitznglam
|
Apr 30 2013, 11:46 AM
Post #1725
|
- Posts:
- 101
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,996
- Joined:
- 20 May 2012
|
- tc6_11
- Apr 29 2013, 07:04 PM
- Chipper
- Apr 29 2013, 06:57 PM
- Jetter
- Apr 28 2013, 06:52 PM
That was the goss today that Eagles are pulling the pin, that Management was going to adjust player points so that each club can pick up Eagle players so they aren't lost to other comps and that Baker was gone to Mittagong already!!
Every club has done their recruitment so anything for now on is a 'first in best dressed' which isn't going to be even or fair to everyone. Maybe will will have a NFL like draft where clubs pick at the Eagles pieces.
Just wondering if any truth has come on this subject?? T.C...? You seem to be honest and know most things within the group... How many extra points? Is there a limit on players per team? Will there allocated points change from what the currently are? Any one have any thoughts?
Too many rumours flying around at the moment. All I know is that we wont be able to afford anyone if they did become available. Don't think you would see any of the eagle players want to have a run at oakdale because of the glorified ASSISTANT coach even after his no stop phone calls, heard a lot of talk that a majority will be going to mittagong now the are down as 10 point players
|
|
|
| |
|
Ozzy
|
Apr 30 2013, 12:12 PM
Post #1726
|
- Posts:
- 245
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,789
- Joined:
- 7 May 2011
|
What is going on at Moss Vale they forfeited reggies last week, will they see out the season? Also hear Oaks are close to pulling out and dropping back to 2nd division
|
|
|
| |
|
tc6_11
|
Apr 30 2013, 12:28 PM
Post #1727
|
- Posts:
- 1,356
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,627
- Joined:
- 29 April 2010
|
- footylover
- Apr 30 2013, 09:17 AM
- pastrami
- Apr 30 2013, 09:00 AM
- mckormick
- Apr 29 2013, 10:38 PM
- New kid
- Apr 29 2013, 08:38 PM
The talk is their lowest pointed playrs would be 10points 37 players at 10points = 370 that isn't including 25 point players they have common sense is they can not field 3 teams and some weeks their 18s play away from reserves and first
PASTRAMI have a read of the above mate. Lol its not as easy as just getting on with it when you cant field 3 teams with the points allocated
My point: it is not easy, but on the other hand not undo-able. Why not drop U18s or Reserve Grade for a week till this gets resolved, or put on the sideline those big point players??? Not ideal but an option. Forfeiting ALL 3 grades was a last option in my opinion but it became the first option.
We sat the 18s out when we played thirlmere and got slammed by the group for doing it and were told they had to play every week ... Not taking you to task, and this is only what i've heard, but the lateness and the spirit of the Under 18's forfeit was the catalyst for the dramatic punishment. If you were to tell the group that you could not field a reserve grade at the start of the week it is a different story. When we are presented with both sides of the story tomorrow night a decision will be made by the clubs I just hope that it is clear from both sides, because I will be making an informed decision, not a biased one.
Edited by tc6_11, Apr 30 2013, 12:29 PM.
|
|
|
| |
|
footylover
|
Apr 30 2013, 12:53 PM
Post #1728
|
- Posts:
- 264
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,728
- Joined:
- 16 March 2011
|
- tc6_11
- Apr 30 2013, 12:28 PM
- footylover
- Apr 30 2013, 09:17 AM
- pastrami
- Apr 30 2013, 09:00 AM
- mckormick
- Apr 29 2013, 10:38 PM
- New kid
- Apr 29 2013, 08:38 PM
The talk is their lowest pointed playrs would be 10points 37 players at 10points = 370 that isn't including 25 point players they have common sense is they can not field 3 teams and some weeks their 18s play away from reserves and first
PASTRAMI have a read of the above mate. Lol its not as easy as just getting on with it when you cant field 3 teams with the points allocated
My point: it is not easy, but on the other hand not undo-able. Why not drop U18s or Reserve Grade for a week till this gets resolved, or put on the sideline those big point players??? Not ideal but an option. Forfeiting ALL 3 grades was a last option in my opinion but it became the first option.
We sat the 18s out when we played thirlmere and got slammed by the group for doing it and were told they had to play every week ...
Not taking you to task, and this is only what i've heard, but the lateness and the spirit of the Under 18's forfeit was the catalyst for the dramatic punishment. If you were to tell the group that you could not field a reserve grade at the start of the week it is a different story. When we are presented with both sides of the story tomorrow night a decision will be made by the clubs I just hope that it is clear from both sides, because I will be making an informed decision, not a biased one. And I hope for our sake the right decision is made ...
|
|
|
| |
|
disco stu
|
Apr 30 2013, 01:00 PM
Post #1729
|
- Posts:
- 2,518
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #142
- Joined:
- 31 March 2007
|
- Ozzy
- Apr 30 2013, 12:12 PM
What is going on at Moss Vale they forfeited reggies last week, will they see out the season? Also hear Oaks are close to pulling out and dropping back to 2nd division Massive injury toll, myself & a mate of mine were asked jokingly to make a comeback in Reggies that's how serious it is. There well below their points so can accommodate some committed players looking for a run.
|
|
|
| |
|
Ozzy
|
Apr 30 2013, 01:07 PM
Post #1730
|
- Posts:
- 245
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,789
- Joined:
- 7 May 2011
|
- footylover
- Apr 30 2013, 12:53 PM
- tc6_11
- Apr 30 2013, 12:28 PM
- footylover
- Apr 30 2013, 09:17 AM
- pastrami
- Apr 30 2013, 09:00 AM
- mckormick
- Apr 29 2013, 10:38 PM
- New kid
- Apr 29 2013, 08:38 PM
The talk is their lowest pointed playrs would be 10points 37 players at 10points = 370 that isn't including 25 point players they have common sense is they can not field 3 teams and some weeks their 18s play away from reserves and first
PASTRAMI have a read of the above mate. Lol its not as easy as just getting on with it when you cant field 3 teams with the points allocated
My point: it is not easy, but on the other hand not undo-able. Why not drop U18s or Reserve Grade for a week till this gets resolved, or put on the sideline those big point players??? Not ideal but an option. Forfeiting ALL 3 grades was a last option in my opinion but it became the first option.
We sat the 18s out when we played thirlmere and got slammed by the group for doing it and were told they had to play every week ...
Not taking you to task, and this is only what i've heard, but the lateness and the spirit of the Under 18's forfeit was the catalyst for the dramatic punishment. If you were to tell the group that you could not field a reserve grade at the start of the week it is a different story. When we are presented with both sides of the story tomorrow night a decision will be made by the clubs I just hope that it is clear from both sides, because I will be making an informed decision, not a biased one.
And I hope for our sake the right decision is made ... I am a bit confused, what is being voted on exactly
|
|
|
| |
|
Ozzy
|
Apr 30 2013, 01:09 PM
Post #1731
|
- Posts:
- 245
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,789
- Joined:
- 7 May 2011
|
- disco stu
- Apr 30 2013, 01:00 PM
- Ozzy
- Apr 30 2013, 12:12 PM
What is going on at Moss Vale they forfeited reggies last week, will they see out the season? Also hear Oaks are close to pulling out and dropping back to 2nd division
Massive injury toll, myself & a mate of mine were asked jokingly to make a comeback in Reggies that's how serious it is. There well below their points so can accommodate some committed players looking for a run. It's a shame with all the effort put in to get the club back on track, hopefully the numbers start coming back and both grades get back on the field.
|
|
|
| |
|
tc6_11
|
Apr 30 2013, 01:55 PM
Post #1732
|
- Posts:
- 1,356
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,627
- Joined:
- 29 April 2010
|
- Ozzy
- Apr 30 2013, 01:07 PM
- footylover
- Apr 30 2013, 12:53 PM
- tc6_11
- Apr 30 2013, 12:28 PM
- footylover
- Apr 30 2013, 09:17 AM
- pastrami
- Apr 30 2013, 09:00 AM
- mckormick
- Apr 29 2013, 10:38 PM
- New kid
- Apr 29 2013, 08:38 PM
The talk is their lowest pointed playrs would be 10points 37 players at 10points = 370 that isn't including 25 point players they have common sense is they can not field 3 teams and some weeks their 18s play away from reserves and first
PASTRAMI have a read of the above mate. Lol its not as easy as just getting on with it when you cant field 3 teams with the points allocated
My point: it is not easy, but on the other hand not undo-able. Why not drop U18s or Reserve Grade for a week till this gets resolved, or put on the sideline those big point players??? Not ideal but an option. Forfeiting ALL 3 grades was a last option in my opinion but it became the first option.
We sat the 18s out when we played thirlmere and got slammed by the group for doing it and were told they had to play every week ...
Not taking you to task, and this is only what i've heard, but the lateness and the spirit of the Under 18's forfeit was the catalyst for the dramatic punishment. If you were to tell the group that you could not field a reserve grade at the start of the week it is a different story. When we are presented with both sides of the story tomorrow night a decision will be made by the clubs I just hope that it is clear from both sides, because I will be making an informed decision, not a biased one.
And I hope for our sake the right decision is made ...
I am a bit confused, what is being voted on exactly I'm not sure as yet, so im only assuming but a decision will be made by the clubs on either Easts points, their status in the competition, and the players.
|
|
|
| |
|
Warriors78
|
Apr 30 2013, 07:46 PM
Post #1733
|
- Posts:
- 554
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,544
- Joined:
- 18 January 2010
|
just went past eagles training boys were working hard good to see group six needs c'town & Ctown needs group six footy
|
|
|
| |
|
New kid
|
Apr 30 2013, 11:34 PM
Post #1734
|
- Posts:
- 50
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #2,191
- Joined:
- 27 April 2013
|
How is the voting happening is it a secret vote or a show of hands it's going to be a real intersting meeting tomorrow night I wish I was a fly on the wall in that room to see what Is said
|
|
|
| |
|
tc6_11
|
May 1 2013, 07:15 AM
Post #1735
|
- Posts:
- 1,356
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,627
- Joined:
- 29 April 2010
|
So Peter Jensen signed for Narellan this week. Narellan are massively bankrolled
|
|
|
| |
|
dilly
|
May 1 2013, 07:26 AM
Post #1736
|
- Posts:
- 57
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,443
- Joined:
- 28 May 2009
|
- tc6_11
- Apr 30 2013, 01:55 PM
- Ozzy
- Apr 30 2013, 01:07 PM
- footylover
- Apr 30 2013, 12:53 PM
- tc6_11
- Apr 30 2013, 12:28 PM
- footylover
- Apr 30 2013, 09:17 AM
- pastrami
- Apr 30 2013, 09:00 AM
- mckormick
- Apr 29 2013, 10:38 PM
- New kid
- Apr 29 2013, 08:38 PM
The talk is their lowest pointed playrs would be 10points 37 players at 10points = 370 that isn't including 25 point players they have common sense is they can not field 3 teams and some weeks their 18s play away from reserves and first
PASTRAMI have a read of the above mate. Lol its not as easy as just getting on with it when you cant field 3 teams with the points allocated
My point: it is not easy, but on the other hand not undo-able. Why not drop U18s or Reserve Grade for a week till this gets resolved, or put on the sideline those big point players??? Not ideal but an option. Forfeiting ALL 3 grades was a last option in my opinion but it became the first option.
We sat the 18s out when we played thirlmere and got slammed by the group for doing it and were told they had to play every week ...
Not taking you to task, and this is only what i've heard, but the lateness and the spirit of the Under 18's forfeit was the catalyst for the dramatic punishment. If you were to tell the group that you could not field a reserve grade at the start of the week it is a different story. When we are presented with both sides of the story tomorrow night a decision will be made by the clubs I just hope that it is clear from both sides, because I will be making an informed decision, not a biased one.
And I hope for our sake the right decision is made ...
I am a bit confused, what is being voted on exactly
I'm not sure as yet, so im only assuming but a decision will be made by the clubs on either Easts points, their status in the competition, and the players. The only way the Group 6 General Committee (clubs) can make any informed decision is if the Group Management provides the Clubs with a concise, accurate and factual (not embellished) account of what exactly has transpired during this whole sorry state of affairs. At the moment there has been a lot of 'he said, she said' there has been no official word from the Group in regards to what has transpired (apart from the Under 18's situation). Anything that has been said from then on has been by mouth, which in my opinion is not official (easy to deny later). It should be in the form of a report, whereby clubs can take it back to their committees to digest, form an opinion and then have the opportunity to ask questions to clarify. Unfortunately, I cannot see this happening, so I cannot see how any club can make an informed decision to vote on this complex situation.
|
|
|
| |
|
footylover
|
May 1 2013, 09:18 AM
Post #1737
|
- Posts:
- 264
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,728
- Joined:
- 16 March 2011
|
- dilly
- May 1 2013, 07:26 AM
- tc6_11
- Apr 30 2013, 01:55 PM
- Ozzy
- Apr 30 2013, 01:07 PM
- footylover
- Apr 30 2013, 12:53 PM
- tc6_11
- Apr 30 2013, 12:28 PM
- footylover
- Apr 30 2013, 09:17 AM
- pastrami
- Apr 30 2013, 09:00 AM
- mckormick
- Apr 29 2013, 10:38 PM
- New kid
- Apr 29 2013, 08:38 PM
The talk is their lowest pointed playrs would be 10points 37 players at 10points = 370 that isn't including 25 point players they have common sense is they can not field 3 teams and some weeks their 18s play away from reserves and first
PASTRAMI have a read of the above mate. Lol its not as easy as just getting on with it when you cant field 3 teams with the points allocated
My point: it is not easy, but on the other hand not undo-able. Why not drop U18s or Reserve Grade for a week till this gets resolved, or put on the sideline those big point players??? Not ideal but an option. Forfeiting ALL 3 grades was a last option in my opinion but it became the first option.
We sat the 18s out when we played thirlmere and got slammed by the group for doing it and were told they had to play every week ...
Not taking you to task, and this is only what i've heard, but the lateness and the spirit of the Under 18's forfeit was the catalyst for the dramatic punishment. If you were to tell the group that you could not field a reserve grade at the start of the week it is a different story. When we are presented with both sides of the story tomorrow night a decision will be made by the clubs I just hope that it is clear from both sides, because I will be making an informed decision, not a biased one.
And I hope for our sake the right decision is made ...
I am a bit confused, what is being voted on exactly
I'm not sure as yet, so im only assuming but a decision will be made by the clubs on either Easts points, their status in the competition, and the players.
The only way the Group 6 General Committee (clubs) can make any informed decision is if the Group Management provides the Clubs with a concise, accurate and factual (not embellished) account of what exactly has transpired during this whole sorry state of affairs. At the moment there has been a lot of 'he said, she said' there has been no official word from the Group in regards to what has transpired (apart from the Under 18's situation). Anything that has been said from then on has been by mouth, which in my opinion is not official (easy to deny later). It should be in the form of a report, whereby clubs can take it back to their committees to digest, form an opinion and then have the opportunity to ask questions to clarify. Unfortunately, I cannot see this happening, so I cannot see how any club can make an informed decision to vote on this complex situation. I know eagles people will have every bit of information they have from when it all started so I'm sure group 6 will to to get it sorted out tonight one way or the other it needs to be done tonight and hopefully it will be ...
|
|
|
| |
|
red eagle
|
May 1 2013, 10:34 AM
Post #1738
|
- Posts:
- 193
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #1,862
- Joined:
- 8 September 2011
|
- tc6_11
- May 1 2013, 07:15 AM
So Peter Jensen signed for Narellan this week. Narellan are massively bankrolled And they also contacted one of our boys
|
|
|
| |
|
New kid
|
May 1 2013, 12:42 PM
Post #1739
|
- Posts:
- 50
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #2,191
- Joined:
- 27 April 2013
|
What player ?
|
|
|
| |
|
disco stu
|
May 1 2013, 12:50 PM
Post #1740
|
- Posts:
- 2,518
- Group:
- Full Member
- Member
- #142
- Joined:
- 31 March 2007
|
- dilly
- May 1 2013, 07:26 AM
- tc6_11
- Apr 30 2013, 01:55 PM
- Ozzy
- Apr 30 2013, 01:07 PM
- footylover
- Apr 30 2013, 12:53 PM
- tc6_11
- Apr 30 2013, 12:28 PM
- footylover
- Apr 30 2013, 09:17 AM
- pastrami
- Apr 30 2013, 09:00 AM
- mckormick
- Apr 29 2013, 10:38 PM
- New kid
- Apr 29 2013, 08:38 PM
The talk is their lowest pointed playrs would be 10points 37 players at 10points = 370 that isn't including 25 point players they have common sense is they can not field 3 teams and some weeks their 18s play away from reserves and first
PASTRAMI have a read of the above mate. Lol its not as easy as just getting on with it when you cant field 3 teams with the points allocated
My point: it is not easy, but on the other hand not undo-able. Why not drop U18s or Reserve Grade for a week till this gets resolved, or put on the sideline those big point players??? Not ideal but an option. Forfeiting ALL 3 grades was a last option in my opinion but it became the first option.
We sat the 18s out when we played thirlmere and got slammed by the group for doing it and were told they had to play every week ...
Not taking you to task, and this is only what i've heard, but the lateness and the spirit of the Under 18's forfeit was the catalyst for the dramatic punishment. If you were to tell the group that you could not field a reserve grade at the start of the week it is a different story. When we are presented with both sides of the story tomorrow night a decision will be made by the clubs I just hope that it is clear from both sides, because I will be making an informed decision, not a biased one.
And I hope for our sake the right decision is made ...
I am a bit confused, what is being voted on exactly
I'm not sure as yet, so im only assuming but a decision will be made by the clubs on either Easts points, their status in the competition, and the players.
The only way the Group 6 General Committee (clubs) can make any informed decision is if the Group Management provides the Clubs with a concise, accurate and factual (not embellished) account of what exactly has transpired during this whole sorry state of affairs. At the moment there has been a lot of 'he said, she said' there has been no official word from the Group in regards to what has transpired (apart from the Under 18's situation). Anything that has been said from then on has been by mouth, which in my opinion is not official (easy to deny later). It should be in the form of a report, whereby clubs can take it back to their committees to digest, form an opinion and then have the opportunity to ask questions to clarify. Unfortunately, I cannot see this happening, so I cannot see how any club can make an informed decision to vote on this complex situation. Clubs have at least two nominated delegates that attend group 6 meetings, therefore they will ask appropriate questions on the night and make an informed decision on behalf of their clubs they represent.
|
|
|
| |