Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Exilian. We have moved! Any content you're looking for still exists, so don't worry. Come and join us at our new site:

http://exilian.co.uk/forum/

If you had an account here your user data and posts will all have been transferred, but login here to get your automated temporary password.

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
EU anti-dumping duty on seamless stainless steel pipes against China; wpc floor
Topic Started: May 16 2018, 05:11:22 AM (21 Views)
qizhen0926
Royal Amourer
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]

The European Union announced on the 6th that it will extend the anti-dumping duty on stainless steel seamless pipes in China for another 5 years and continue to impose anti-dumping duties of 48.3% to 71.9% on Chinese products involved in the case.

The European Commission issued a public announcement on the same day to inform this decision. Stainless steel seamless pipe is a kind of hollow steel which is widely used in petroleum, natural gas, and other transportation pipelines, and because of its lighter weight, it is also often used to make mechanical parts and engineering structures.

The case of the EU's stainless steel seamless steel pipe in China originated in 2010. In September of that year, the European Union launched an anti-dumping investigation against Chinese products involved in the case; in December 2011, the final ruling imposed an anti-dumping tax of 48.3% to 71.9% on the Chinese products involved in the case.

In December 2016, after a five-year anti-dumping tax expired, the European Union initiated an anti-dumping review investigation and announced on the 6th that the anti-dumping duty on stainless steel seamless pipes in China was extended by 5 years.

read more:
astm 201 Stainless steel seamless pipe
Angle Iron Flat Bar
Competitive 304 Stainless Steel Strip From Professional Manufacture
wpc pool deck
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Game Guides and Tutorials · Next Topic »
Add Reply